Well - while my comment may not have been truly authentic, there was also a hint of truth. Was the K7 a better, more capable camera than the K5? Of course not. Does the K5 give me stunning images? Yes.
Do I wish I had delayed purchasing the K5, though? Yes. I didn't really need the K5 but I had to have it. For me it was an impulsive purchase. Since obtaining the K5 I have not become a better photographer and my images don't suddenly possess magical qualities.
What the K5 has given is lots of latitude in low light - cleaner images with much lower noise. But it's also given me focus issues. I now use Live View far more than I ever did to get the results I want.
If it weren't for my focus woes I would be jubilant over the K5 and erase the K7 from memory. Until there is a fix, however, I will remember the K7 as the camera that, for me, was always predictable.
Oh - you're question - manual focus and live view resolve focus in low-light. Manual focus less so when shooting wide.
Originally posted by dcmsox2004 hi..... did your k-5 produce acceptable (great) shots outside of low lighting tungsten conditions? some have said they can cheat this problem by manually focusing the camera.... what were your impressions with your k-7 ? positives/negatives which 'made' ya go out and get the k-5... (a body i long for... when it's issues are resolved)
thanks, dave m