Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-21-2011, 04:35 AM   #61

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,940
QuoteOriginally posted by simico Quote
Or those who still get serious FF probably have defective units.
That is the big question. Is my k5 defective? Should I send it in and wait a month for it to come back and then be charged for the cost since it was just as good/bad as it is supposed to be.

03-21-2011, 05:19 AM   #62
wizofoz's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, Outer east.
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,655
I have read many of these (seemingly interminable) threads about the K-5 and its shortcomings (yeah, I know, I should get a life )

From my point of view, and perhaps consumer laws differ in various parts of the consumer kingdom, some K-5's are clearly outside manufacturers stated spec and therefore not fit for purpose. If I'm not mistaken, in Australia we have consumer laws which allow the consumer to simply exchange the unit which has failed the 'spec test' for one which passes same.

Smeggy (please forgive my Aussie familiarity, I recognise we have not been formally introduced)and others, why don't you simply tootle back to the camera store and exchange the faulty unit for one which satisfies your expectations? I'm having trouble with this point. Are the consumer laws so very different in the UK and US?

It seems to me that this is an issue of consumer satisfaction, and compliance to specification. Surely compliance with the published specification is the test of 'fit for use'. No further argument need be pursued.

Am I misreading this situation?
03-21-2011, 06:07 AM   #63
Veteran Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Budapest
Posts: 821
QuoteOriginally posted by Gimbal Quote
That is the big question. Is my k5 defective? Should I send it in and wait a month for it to come back and then be charged for the cost since it was just as good/bad as it is supposed to be.
Well, it was a no brainer for me in December. My first K-5 had stains and FF under lowish tungsten light, confirmed by at least 100 front focused photos in our living room, therefore I sent it in for exchange. Second K-5 had no stains and no noticeable FF, confirmed by several hundreds real life photos (and even some test photos) made under the same conditions with same lenses and subjects, with same fw 1.01 as the first K-5.

Really, some people wrote 1 metre FF even with F8-11 apertures (which would mask/hide focus issues) - that's clearly a defective unit. If I still had severe FF (5+ cm) with fw 1.03 (and after re-calibrating the lenses in daylight just to be sure) I'd send it in, because this would suggest a hardware or hardware calibration issue.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, focus, front, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, light, pentax k-5, possum, shot
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 Low Light AF-C Accuracy - Pentax 35mm f/2.4 Performance? Eric Seavey Pentax K-5 35 12-17-2010 09:33 AM
focus hunting in low light sorin Pentax DSLR Discussion 12 07-17-2010 02:20 PM
Low Light auto focus JohnKSA Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 6 03-10-2010 04:19 AM
EV low light focus question tarsus Photographic Technique 3 06-26-2008 08:22 AM
Wow... Night/low light photography is hard MrApollinax Post Your Photos! 12 06-25-2008 09:55 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]