Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-20-2011, 05:02 PM   #1
New Member




Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryliand
Posts: 7
K-5 Purple Fringing real or imaginary?

I'm thinking of trading my K-7 for a K-5, but I'm concerned about purple fringing issues which came up on my internet search. Purple fringing on my K-10 is one of the reasons I upgraded to the K-7. From what I read the IQ and the ISO range of the K-5 would make this a no-brainer except for the PF concern. Is it real? was it limited to the first batch which had the sensor issues? or is it much ado about nothing? Thanks

03-20-2011, 05:22 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,958
QuoteOriginally posted by mcs Quote
much ado about nothing
More likely than not, that's the case.

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

03-20-2011, 06:12 PM   #3
Pentaxian
JohnBee's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: front of computer
Posts: 4,496
I've been shooting with the K-5 for over a week now and I haven't noticed anything out of the norm in this area(and I'm an admitted measurbator!). I haven't pushed all the stops with regards to lighting conditions, but so far, where highlights and edge distortion goes, everything looks about the same as it did with the K20D.
03-20-2011, 06:52 PM   #4
Pentaxian
Wheatfield's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Posts: 10,043
Purple fringing is one of those things that you will find in any camera if you go looking for it.
OTOH, if you are ware of what conditions will cause it, it is pretty easily avoided.
I don't think the K5 is any worse than any other camera I have used or seen results from in this regard.

03-20-2011, 07:20 PM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,737
Only had a few days with the K5, but I have shot in some "PF territory" without any notice of a problem. Some lenses are more prone to PF, but I haven't seen anything yet on my K5 that would hint at a problem. If you put on the right/wrong lens, like some of the 70-300 models, any camera will PF in the right circumstances.
Regards
03-20-2011, 08:38 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 7,411
I definitely notice it more on my K-5 than I did on my K-7 and K20D, but it's not a huge deal (and generally easily fixable in post).
03-20-2011, 08:38 PM   #7
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 7,411
Also noticed it more on the K-r I tested than on the K-7/K20D.
03-20-2011, 08:46 PM   #8
Veteran Member
Smeggypants's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,536
Can't say i've noticed PF more on my K-5 than I have on my K20D/K10D

03-20-2011, 09:35 PM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Var, South of France
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,071
Noticed it too...

I'm coming from k10/k20/k7/kx (but always with the same lenses set), and on some shots it's quite present...
It comes from the exceptional DR, it seems...
03-20-2011, 09:57 PM   #10
m8o
Veteran Member
m8o's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 40-55'-44" N / 73-24'-07" W [on LI]
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,102
I will say I thought I was seeing more CA & Fringing than on my K10D, well before I saw anyone make a thread about it on this forum here. So I think there's something to it. This is the 1st time I've said anything about it because I have my K10D but haven't done any comparisons, like I need to to be sure.
03-21-2011, 01:29 PM   #11
New Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Finland
Photos: Albums
Posts: 20
I'm getting more PF with K-5 than with K200D, from the very first pictures I took with it (and I wasn't aware of this "problem" beforehand, so I was taken by surprise a bit). Don't know if this is because of higher pixel count, using higher iso values, or what.
03-21-2011, 04:55 PM   #12
Pentaxian
Class A's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 8,934
Unless proven wrong, I think one should chalk up the perceived increase of PF on the K-5 to the higher resolution. At 100% viewing, PF on the K-5 will look worse than on any other Pentax APS-C camera even if the PF is the same in absolute terms, just because of the added magnification. Maybe K-5 images also have higher micro-contrast which would let PF appear to seem worse.

PF is caused by lenses and if the K-5 indeed made it more visible than just because it is a better camera. Sensor blooming is a thing of the past and while I cannot exclude other sensor-related causes, again, I'd plead for "innocent unless proven guilty".
03-21-2011, 05:01 PM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,994
QuoteOriginally posted by Class A Quote
PF is caused by lenses and if the K-5 indeed made it more visible than just because it is a better camera. Sensor blooming is a thing of the past and while I cannot exclude other sensor-related causes, again, I'd plead for "innocent unless proven guilty".

Solid logic.
03-21-2011, 05:45 PM   #14
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,414
I agree with Class A. Lens is very important in judging PF and the higher you MP count the easier it will be to see.

Newer lenses with low dispersion glass or flourite minimize the issue. IF you are getting a lot of PF then try a newer lens design.
03-21-2011, 06:19 PM   #15
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,731
I'm not a K5 owner, but.. the only purple fringing I've had was when I was testing the Sigma 120-400 that I returned. I was testing another couple lenses at the same time ie the 18-135, and Tamron 90 and couldn't reproduce the result. So my first question based on that experience would be, is this a lens issue? So, I'm in agreement with the above posts.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, issues, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k-7, k5, pentax k-5
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does the K5 Amplify Purple Fringing? PixleFish Pentax K-5 27 01-07-2011 01:48 PM
Purple fringing with 31ltd DanielT74 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 11-05-2010 06:11 AM
Purple Fringing stevewig Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 13 09-08-2010 01:01 PM
DA40mm and purple fringing trevorgrout Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 9 07-10-2010 03:46 PM
Purple Fringing on Film glasbak Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 10-05-2009 08:24 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top