Originally posted by thierryk5 I AM SUPPORTING PENTAX,
I PREFER PENTAX, AND PENTAX IS THE BEST SOLUTION FOR MY NEEDS,
and most of the problems i had with the K5 have been fixed now and i recommend people reading this thread to BUY THE K5 as it is a really amazing DSLR
By the way i really don't understand why a 24 fps video mode, a cinema mode, having a fixed ISO, and not to be only in liveview mode for video is not possible for the K5,
are they so expensive things to do ?
Why do you want me to waste thousands with an heavy professionnal camcorder, when pentax can just fix some electronics in a DSLR ?
I am not asking the moon, just a 24fps mode and fixed ISO,
seems so few to me...
What you are asking is for the K5 to be something it isn't.
Did you not realize that it's video mode wasn't what you wanted when you bought?
If not, why not?
The specifications are in the public domain, if the camera isn't what you needed, then you really should have bought something closer to your needs, whether a Pentax or not.
I'd have some sympathy if your thread was titled something like "What I'd Like To See in the Next Camera", but I have little sympathy for knowingly buying something that doesn't do what a person wants and then having to read about how the camera is somehow deficient.
It isn't deficient WRT it's video capabilities, it may not be what you want, and if you bought it knowingly, you have no reason to complain about it.