First and foremost, I hope this is ok to do, but I feel like there is no other way to know for sure without plopping down the $1400.
Anyways, Im curious to see what the K-5 would bring to the table macro-wise for me so i'd love for anyone with time on their hands and both cameras to do me a HUGE favor
I'd like to see two similar, preferably close focused (any lens other than a WA at or near its closest focusing distance will do) shots from both camera's at these ISO's.
ISO 200, ISO 400, and ISO 640ish
In RAW preferably, I can give you my email to send them just PM me
Since these are the ISO's I shoot macro's at (well no higher than 400, but im curious to see what the K-5 can do). If i can get an appreciable amount of IQ boost at ISO 400 it will open up so many new doors for me, making my life so much easier.
So, PLEASE, if anyone has time on their hands and doesn't mind doing this for me I would be VERY thankful.
Might as well post the jpegs on here too for everyone else to see and compare themselves (or i'll post them if you don't have a flickr or something from the edited RAW's
). It would be very informational to possible buyers who care more for low ISO performance