Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
08-22-2011, 07:36 PM   #31
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
QuoteOriginally posted by amoringello Quote
Just need to make sure that the background is actually flat and there is not a building behind? Does the same banding appear when the lens cap is on?

The K5 holds a LOT of data in the shadows, and pushing up the exposure can show things you would not have expected it to have seen.
You'll see examples on the site where the shot appears almost black, but with pushing up the exposure the resulting image becomes almost "usable". (won't win any contests, but a discernible image of reasonable quality can appear)

I have not seen such banding myself and have to agree it may need servicing if it is that bad.
It is not a flat background and could in fact be something else (a fence) in the background. The photo was taken very late at night or very early in the morning (depending on how you look at it) and is in fact, nearly black to the unadjusted eye beyond the icy roof of the car. The point of posting those photos was to show what it looks like. I don't know if it's actually Banding or not (now that you mention it). No I have not tried with the lens cap on but I've shot at much higher ISOs, as I show in the later post, and there is no such phenomenon. I'm really not concerned about it at this point.



08-23-2011, 09:26 AM   #32
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484


For giggles and grins (or not) I took a picture of the lens cap (lens cap on) at ISO 10000 to see what it looks like. Pushed it 4 stops in ACR and boosted the fill light 100% (about as extreme as it gets with ACR) to see what is really there. Lots of color noise (the above is converted to monochrome) but other than that, no apparent 'banding'. Did the same at ISO 32000, basically the same result.


Last edited by JeffJS; 08-23-2011 at 01:03 PM.
08-23-2011, 11:54 AM   #33
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,871
QuoteOriginally posted by JeffJS Quote

For giggles and grins (or not) I took a picture of the lens cap (lens cap on) at ISO 10000 to see shat it looks like. ...
Interesting image.
Anybody wondering if the remaining structures is pattern noise or not ...

Here is an image I created from a mathematical random generator which should exhibit no pattern noise. Any patterns you see are created in your brain

Last edited by falconeye; 06-23-2012 at 03:12 AM.
08-23-2011, 08:35 PM   #34
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
This is mine at 12800 with the same treatment as Jeffs but in LR



08-24-2011, 10:28 AM   #35
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
QuoteOriginally posted by NicoleAu Quote
This is mine at 12800 with the same treatment as Jeffs but in LR
If this is a valid way to push banding out into the open, I'm not seeing any in your shot Nicole. Maybe you could post an example where You see banding?

08-24-2011, 03:43 PM   #36
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
You can't see all the lines going across? When they're in colour they're green and a magenta colour.
08-24-2011, 03:51 PM   #37
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
QuoteOriginally posted by NicoleAu Quote
You can't see all the lines going across? When they're in colour they're green and a magenta colour.
Now that you mention them, Yes. When I think of banding, I think vertical rather than horizontal. Perhaps asking for an exchange if you still can, wouldn't be a bad idea especially if you're seeing this in your photos without any extreme pushing.



08-24-2011, 05:17 PM   #38
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
I've emailed the company I've bought it from, so we'll see what happens.
08-24-2011, 08:41 PM   #39
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
The reply I got back was that artefacts were normal and could they have an exmple of a normal shot taken with it. I've included this photo, taken of hubby at 6400 iso
08-24-2011, 11:02 PM   #40
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
Maybe it's just me so don't take this as disagreement with what you see, but I'm not seeing a problem in that photo. The only thing I would possibly look at with this image is the area where his left shoulder meets the background looks like it Could be banding but it may also just be the way the two out of focus areas are blending. At first I thought I saw it on his left shoulder (reddish and gray horizontal area) but I think that's just the design of the sweater(?). This all probably shouldn't be worth much to you because I've seen Many posts where people reported banding with various cameras and I've typically failed to see it, on multiple screens.

08-24-2011, 11:18 PM   #41
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
It's not the design of his sweater, the same lines continue onto his t-shirt. The lines are vertical on this as I had it in portrait orientation. The rep from the company said he can see the banding very clearly and is contacting Pentax. So we'll see what happens from here I guess.
08-24-2011, 11:27 PM   #42
Inactive Account




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,484
QuoteOriginally posted by NicoleAu Quote
It's not the design of his sweater, the same lines continue onto his t-shirt. The lines are vertical on this as I had it in portrait orientation. The rep from the company said he can see the banding very clearly and is contacting Pentax. So we'll see what happens from here I guess.
That's what I thought I was seeing but I didn't want to make any assumptions here (camera orientation, could have been a crop from a landscape shot, I do it all the time). Warranty should get it taken care of for you. Good luck with it.

08-25-2011, 07:32 AM   #43
Veteran Member
philbaum's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Port Townsend, Washington State, USA
Posts: 3,659
QuoteOriginally posted by NicoleAu Quote
It's not the design of his sweater, the same lines continue onto his t-shirt. The lines are vertical on this as I had it in portrait orientation. The rep from the company said he can see the banding very clearly and is contacting Pentax. So we'll see what happens from here I guess.
I made the same assumption that Jeff did, that the gray and red patch was a part of the sweater. If possible always send in a written description of the problem area with the photo when talking to the mfr. Better more explanation than complaining afterwards

But i agree, there seems to be something badly wrong with that sensor - good luck to you!
08-25-2011, 07:53 AM   #44
Banned




Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 9,675
QuoteOriginally posted by NicoleAu Quote
This is mine at 12800 with the same treatment as Jeffs but in LR

Do you also have this banding when you make a videoclip FullHD with cap on it and then extract one image out of it?

Your banding looks not normal!
08-25-2011, 03:17 PM   #45
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 539
I've never used the video on it, I'll give that a go later.

I have noticed if the photographs are taken in well lit areas, you can't really see the banding, but taken in shadowed areas, it's very noticeable.

Last edited by NicoleAu; 08-25-2011 at 03:23 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, iso, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, pentax k-5, tripod

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
10,000 miles in 5,000 minutes r0ckstarr General Talk 3 06-13-2011 11:57 AM
ISO 36,000 Baby!!! crossover37 Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 7 05-16-2011 09:43 AM
Canon 7D $3,000 to modify or $5,000 & it's done Samsungian Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 1 02-20-2010 01:34 PM
only $38,000.00 wlank Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 3 01-30-2010 06:12 PM
Pentax K-x vs Nikon D3000: ISO 100meters Pentax News and Rumors 8 01-15-2010 10:48 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:13 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top