Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-28-2011, 11:14 AM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 485
K5 Settings

Getting my new K5 this week, and I was just wondering if you guys just leave highlight, and shadows turned on? Also, are there anyother settings you suggest to get up and running? Are the images as soft coming right from the camera as the K7's? Thanks.

08-28-2011, 11:21 AM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,397
I don't, as I prefer to make those fixes in PP or via a RAW processor.

Check out our k-5 review on the homepage for a few recommended settings!
08-28-2011, 11:34 AM   #3
Veteran Member
octavmandru's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: somewhere around
Posts: 615
I leave it on, for general purposes photography. Just 'cause I'm lazy.
(of course, this is the reason why I also shoot Jpeg. I know, disgusting...)

Octav
08-28-2011, 12:18 PM   #4
Veteran Member
snappychappy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,636
Fix any issues in PP and leave settings on default. I always shoot RAW that helps a lot in Post Processing.

08-28-2011, 01:40 PM   #5
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Prague
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,198
for "serious" shooting RAW and then you don't care about settings like these. When IQ isn't critical, then I do use shadow and mainly highlight correction in Jpg to make use a bit of the great DR the camera has.
08-28-2011, 01:59 PM   #6
Loyal Site Supporter
imtheguy's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Virginia Beach
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,950
I tested and found that not only do the shadow/highlight settings help, but there is visibly less noise when using the settings on. I only tested only ISOs 400 and 800. Here is where the techies can jump in but I am guessing the better noise comes from the way the camera pushes a lower ISO. So, better dynamic range and less noise. What I have not noticed is any drawbacks but assume there are some.
08-28-2011, 02:23 PM   #7
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lyngby, Copenhagen
Photos: Albums
Posts: 742
Highlight and perhaps shadow correction are good for high-contrast situations and low iso, typically sunlit scenes. The downsides are noise, but it's only visible at higher ISOs like 1600. I turn them off again in low light and high ISO.

I also use the lens distortion correction when I use the kit lens indoors. It has significant barrel distortion at the wide end and it's very obvious in some interior shots where straight lines fall near the image edges.

Sincerely,
--Anders.
08-28-2011, 02:57 PM   #8
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Blue Mountains NSW
Posts: 4
If yuo turn on highlight correction, you will find the ISO limited to 160 minimum setting. I use shaddow correction but no highlight correction for this reason. Bur I mostly shoot RAW and play with it later. Very happy with my K5.

08-28-2011, 09:24 PM   #9
Ash
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,681
RAW is the way to go - full control over your PP process awaits you.
The results aren't 'soft' coming straight out of the box, but most images benefit significantly from a pass of sharpening in PP.
08-29-2011, 05:06 AM   #10
Site Supporter
savoche's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lowlands of Norway
Posts: 7,890
After having experimented with a lot of different settings, I've ended up turning all the correctional stuff off. If nothing else having them on slows down the camera, especially picture reviewing. And I found it time consuming to change the settings according to the shooting conditions. I prefer to trade more time spent post processing for less time waiting for the camera. And I'm not even sure if the in-camera adjustments would reduce the need for PPing at all, really.

But there's only one way to find out what suits you, and that's by trial (and potentially error )
08-29-2011, 05:45 AM   #11
GSk
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sørumsand, Norway
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 59
I also prefer shooting RAW and do post production in a raw converter.

I had K-7 before K-5, and in my opinion images from K-5 are sharper than from the K-7 coming right from the camera. My K-5 images are as a whole much better in terms of IQ right from the camera than the K-7 images were.
08-29-2011, 07:03 AM   #12
Forum Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 57
The K5 is a low-light wonder, and the only way to really take advantage of this fact is to shoot in RAW and tinker with luminance in Photoshop or Lightroom (or the like).
08-29-2011, 07:43 AM   #13
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 24,219
I shoot RAW+....the Jpegs appear very good in most instances, the RAW let me correct defects in exposure and WB if the Jpeg missed the mark.
Works for me.
Regards!
08-31-2011, 07:28 PM   #14
Pentaxian
rvannatta's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Apiary, Oregon
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,175
I agree with the 'raw guys'. I'm hard corp for the RAW, and no professional shooter, but I use photoshop elements and use the DNG version of RAW.
It is ever so much easier to fix a bunch of things with the RAW mode..... While the K5 gets it right far more often than my K10D did the tweeks that are needed work more easily when applied to the RAW.....
08-31-2011, 07:42 PM   #15
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 24,219
It may take a little while to adjust the settings if you use Jpegs....the K5 is quite different than my K20D, and after several months, I think I have finally found the settings I prefer best, but it did take some effort.
Raw images from the K5 process with greater ease by far than those from my K20D. The K5 is a fun camera to use, and processing is a fun part of using it for me.
Regards!
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, pentax k-5, settings
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Settings melvis2 Pentax K-5 10 08-17-2011 03:52 PM
K-5 settings P2 sap Pentax K-5 4 06-04-2011 07:32 AM
K-5 settings.. sap Pentax K-5 9 05-30-2011 05:24 AM
Your K-5 settings bsudrew Pentax K-5 3 02-17-2011 12:20 AM
K5 - Recommended Settings???? conradcjc Pentax K-5 5 11-11-2010 06:14 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top