Originally posted by Brooke Meyer Updated both of my K-5s Wed. night, 15 minutes total. Shot dancer in a ballet studio the next day. She needed need photos for upcoming Summer classes NY. Used 2 Pentax 540's in manual on Cowboy Studio trigger through umbrellas to stop jump action at 1/160 shutter speed. Worked fine.
Shot this today of musician warming up before a performance. Dark parlor of a restored historic RR hotel. Couple of overhead can lights, a few windows and pink walls. Manual exposure. Tamron 28-75 at 75, Pentax 540 P-TTL at -1.0 with a piece of black foam around the flash, like a 3/4 snoot, bounced off the opposite wall. Worked fine, got the shot and a lot more.
Brooke, thanks for posting the nice pic : ) I have to ask you about your Tamron 28-75 and I'll keep it on topic by referencing it to this firmware update : ) How has your Tamron and K5 been without flash? I have always had a love-hate relationship with mine straight through its K10D days, but it seems to have more focus issues this past two years, though I can't tell exactly as I've put it away in frustration rather than rigorously test it. I love its tone but am also frustrated by its sweet spot and how the bokeh transitions are. I've done portraits where two subjects are flat next to each other and one is in and the other out though they are only I0 inches apart and on the same plane. Or a subject's nose is fairly sharp but their eyes aren't, and this is all over the focal range and f stops. I need to step back way farther than is desired to lessen this into acceptability. This would be unrelated to focus performance but has tempered any drive on my part to solve it's focus issues. I find that in natural light it very consistently auto-misfocuses slightly, and also with tungsten lights it is just a sure bet to not autofocus properly. However, with flash, both the unit's and my 540FGZ, the Tamron does not do this. Have you ever experienced these issues? And are you detecting any difference with it and the K5 after the update?
While I don't do enough troubleshooting to get more certainty (it's always a case of switching lenses, seeing good results, being relieved and then not looking back,and then there are a billion pictures to prepare, so I always say I'll troubleshoot it and never get around to it under non-under-the-gun situations). I would love to use the 28-75 more than taking it out every few months and putting it back in the drawer again! But I've just not had good fortune with it. What are your thoughts, pre and post update? My impression is that everything is equal to how it was before, not better or worse. (?) I have a feeling that if you and others say their 28-75 is not different after the update but was and is still useful, mine is going off to Tamron.
Thanks!
David