Originally posted by pentaman Actually not resisting 43mm - I just consolidated my set of lenses to what I need to be functional. A DA 16-50mm, DA 50-150mm cover the range I shoot. I have up my 31mm, but will never give up my 77mm, since it shoots wonders with portraits. While I don't have an immediate need for 43mm, I might get it eventually (a little too long for walkaround, but great as "full size portrait" I suppose).
Aaaah - well, if I had that set o' lenses, I wouldn't necessarily need to rush out and buy the FA43 either! *drool!*
FWIW, I have discovered that the 43 is a really really flexible focal length (which surprised me - 50mm was too long for me & I didn't like 35mm, but 43.....). Secondly, it definitely has its own rendering, quite different from the 77 or the 31, and very lovely. So, you know, it'll lure you in eventually
Quote: I have read up on Neil's blog, and also the other off-camera flashes, including Strobist. Great material (but less time).
ITA - Strobist has been a wealth of info, great site!
Quote: Could you elaborate on the K-5 custom WB? I generally shoot in raw, and set the WB later during post. One idea I had was to shoot a 18% gray for one of the frames, and use it as a reference during Lightroom processing. Does custom WB work for raw as well?
Oh man, you don't know about this feature? BEST. FEATURE. EVER. You don't shoot your 18% card and then use PS later, you use the 18% card to pre-set the WB
*in camera!*
Go into the WB menu, go down to the screen-looking-icon with the "3" next to it, second from the bottom (*not* K3 - that's the bottom of the menu, the one you want is just above it). Click through to the 1, 2 and 3 options - those are the 3 slots for custom WB settings. Click through on one of them, and on the upper left of the screen, you'll see "shutter adjust." Now take a photo of your 18% card in the room you're setting your WB for - bam, now every shot you take with your WB on that custom setting, is custom adjusted for the lighting in that room.
Once I discovered this, I've used it every time I'm in indoor lighting. It's very very accurate so far as I've found
Quote: And now, to decide if I want Metz 50 or Pentax 540.....
You've undoubtedly seen the many really good write-ups comparing
Pentax compatible flashes. The only reason I went with the Metz 50 was it was on sale at the moment for $199
Quote:
[....]
Bought the book, and read most of his posts. While I have read a lot of strobist posts, I have not been able to understand many concepts until I have used them (successfully or not).
Given this, and given that K-5 performs admirably well in P-TTL, I hope to get some good/great shots. Thank you all for the advice!
You're very welcome, though it's the advice of another newbie
OTOH, advice from someone who *just* learned a skill you're acquiring can often be more pertinent than someone who's forgotten what initially foxed them about the subject, many moons ago
I, too, need to put what I'm reading about into effect before I truly get it. My family members put up with 2 weeks of me shooting bounce-flash photos of them ALL THE TIME, everywhere we went, while they watched movies, while we ate dinner LOL! I'd read about a technique, grab the camera & flash, and go put it into effect - by far the fastest way to internalize the information, and make all my mistakes as fast as possible!
Good luck - and come back & post photos for us!
ETA: Returning to re-iterate the need to update your flash & K-5 to the latest firmware - absolutely necessary for p-TTL to work
(hmmm - does the Pentax flash allow you to update the flash's firmware on your own? That's a feature I wouldn't go without, since every time the camera firmware gets updated, you might need to update the flash's firmware....and if you have to send it back to the factory, that's rather inconvienient!
)