Originally posted by NZ_Ross Guys, if you are having a mid-life crisis then remember that a mid-life crisis camera is cheaper than a mid-life crisis car...
Never fear. I would never waste money on a car. I'm still driving the same 1994 model that I bought in 2002.
It's still in nearly new condition, though, thanks to the previous owner and "thanks" to the price of gas these last nine years.
Originally posted by NZ_Ross and both together are way cheaper (by an exponential factor) than a mid-life crisis woman change.
I first need to find a woman that I can then exchange for another one (or not).
Originally posted by NZ_Ross I summary - if in mid-life crisis - buy the camera...
My point-and-shoot sure hasn't filled the bill these last nine years, although it has tried valiantly. The K-5, on the other hand, well, it's in a class by itself (until the "K-5n" arrives?).
Originally posted by NZ_Ross think about the car and stay clear of changing women. Then you will have both a new camera, and spare change to spend on lenses :-), all for much less than you would spend on a divorce lawyer, let alone the settlement.
I'm not into cars (except maybe a Tesla, which will remain forever a fantasy), and I can't find any women around this neck of the prairie to steer clear of.
Originally posted by NZ_Ross My little piece of wisdom for the day.
Thanks.