Originally posted by ronnies Just have to say that the jpeg engine in a camera is irrelevant if you shoot raw. The other thing is don't blame Sony for the 'hot shoe' change. They inherited that design from Minolta.
Ronnie
You are absolutely right about the jpeg engine not mattering if you shoot raw. Personally, I use a big memory card, and always shot both at the same time. I would estimate that I just take the jpegs in more than 99% of the cases, and only use the raw files for some special photos where I want to adjust something more than what the jpegs allows (like lifting the shadows a lot or extracting the last bit of highlight information). Shooting only raw and developing each image is way to tedious for me. For someone that does shoot raw, I could think of two camera-specific things (except the lenses) that could effect the results: the AA filter and the color filters (the Bayer-pattern array of red, green and blue filters in front of the pixels). I am not sure if the AA and color filters are different between different brands using the same sensor, but I think that it might be the case
Thanks for enlightening us (especially me). I really like how Sony has improved sensor and battery technology, and now I can have a little less mixed feeling about them.
(Sony was the company that introduced usable lithium ion batteries back about 20 years ago.)