Originally posted by dane.dawg Ive invested alot into pentax over the last year and i hear alot about the slow and unreliable auto focus. Pentax and olympus are the only dslr ive ever used, so my question is is the AF on the K-5 that bad for wildlife compared to canikon?? cheers Travis
I've had my K-5 for a little around 2 months now. I would not rate the AF bad, but simply as "different", which requires some adjusting around it. The main issue is that the AF points are very large and people might not be understanding that the system is locking onto something, but not necessarily what they wanted.
It simply requires adjustment to shooting style and one must understand that AF is also based on the lenses being used. In my case, the FA35 is my primary lens, but also the one that produces the most misses in low light, while my F50 1.7 and M85 f2 (the later using catch in focus) are both superb, though with the M85, if I focus too fast, I get soft focus.
If you're interested, check out this
blog entry of mine. The nighttime shots were all done with the FA35. A few of the band are soft or blurry, which is obviously my technique having been flawed and also due to the spontaneous nature of the festival. At least one other showed a soft focus (biased towards the front), but also movement was responsible there. A previous festival excursion in daylight yielded much better results.
I also find my f50 1.7 to produce the highest keeper rate of all my lenses, day or night.
Additionally, I'll submit that the 5DII had a vastly inferior AF system to the K-5, but we see hundreds of thousands, if not, millions of the world's greatest pictures during its cycle, no issues. It's about perception. If it's inferior or not is something someone can decide for themselves by doing some footwork and demoing or renting.
I'm still new to the K-5, but I'm getting better with predicting its behavior.