Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-25-2012, 02:12 PM   #1
Veteran Member
Crosshair's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 332
Why isn't this image sharp ?

I took this with the k-5 and the FA*85. Information is in the exif. I converted from RAW in Photoshop 6.0

I have more questions than the heading of this thread, such as;

- the lack of sharpness

- why is there so much noise



I'm thinking because of underexposure. But, despite that, I expected a sharper image since my FA*85 nearly almost gave me sharper images than this at 1.8. I also used sufficient shutter speed to freeze the moment.

here is the image (full size when opened alone in a new tab) ;




Last edited by Crosshair; 08-25-2012 at 02:29 PM.
08-25-2012, 02:24 PM   #2
Pentaxian
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,314
I think the main problems are that the person is relatively far away and the lens was wide open. It is also possible the focus is a little off, especially since the DoF at that aperture is very thin. The noise might also be caused by humidity of the air and amplified by the post processing. That is the only things I can come up with.
But if you scale the photo down a bit it immediately looks better.
08-25-2012, 02:47 PM   #3
Pentaxian
JinDesu's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York City
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,624
Focus is definitely off, you can see it in the chromatic aberration outlining him.
08-25-2012, 03:00 PM   #4
Loyal Site Supporter
AdrianM's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 543
I think that there are three issues that I can see, noting that there is a lot of EXIF info missing (such as focus mode):
(1) I wouldn't expect a really sharp shot at f1.8 out of any lens except under perhaps perfect controlled conditions
(2) The histogram is way over to the left - the shot is basically underexposed (hence noise). I note a -1.7 exposure bias
(3) I note that EXIF has a value for "saturation" of "High Saturation" - have you done something in post processing to boost saturation, and thereby boosted the noise ?

Without the focus mode info in EXIF, it is hard to tell what you sctually focused on, or whether you used single shot, held down the shutter button for a 'long' time before shooting, or used AF.C, or multi-point or single point focus. All of these settings can lead to different results.

08-25-2012, 04:12 PM   #5
Veteran Member
tclausen's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,399
I'll second those who say that focus is off, plain and simply.

Something else that befuddles me is the "specks" on the right-hand side of the boy, looking as-if you were enlarging from a negative with some dust/dirt on it.....Something on your sensor or the rear element of your lens?
08-25-2012, 05:27 PM   #6
Site Supporter
SpecialK's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: So California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,424
QuoteQuote:
Something on your sensor or the rear element of your lens?
There are speckles, but they would not show if they were on the lens or sensor, especially wide open. I'd say water spray?
08-25-2012, 05:35 PM   #7
Site Supporter
Chaos_Realm's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,247
QuoteOriginally posted by tclausen Quote
Something else that befuddles me is the "specks"
This would just be a few bits of water as it looks like the subject is wet.

I suggest a little bit of miss focus, under exposure, wide aperture and fast moving subject could all contribute to create "softness" in the image.
08-25-2012, 07:53 PM   #8
Pentaxian
Sagitta's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,912
I'm guessing you had water spray/splashing going on and the camera autofocused on that rather then the kid. Add in the underexposure and the obvious mugginess of the air, and there you go.

08-25-2012, 08:31 PM   #9
Veteran Member
Venturi's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,639
I believe it's underexposure as the root cause.

Underexposure compresses all of the data into the bottom end of the sensor's dynamic range. That will cause muddiness making you think it's out of focus, and signal drop-out (noise).

I pulled the photo into CS4 and let it auto-correct tone & contrast and it's a good 2 stops under exposed. I don't think it missed focus. He's pretty clear once you bring up the levels. I don't see any CA or fringing either.
Attached Images
 
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, fa*85, image, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, pentax k-5
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just how sharp is sharp? (Pentax-FA 50mm 2.8) dcshooter Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 12-01-2011 06:04 AM
Playback - Slight Delay in Image Becoming Sharp jwcjrccc Pentax K-r 7 10-01-2011 08:10 AM
Resizing image in photoshop without changing the original image quality LFLee Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 14 09-25-2011 05:18 PM
Oh, come on! Isn't anybody going to say anything.... Parallax General Talk 12 10-16-2010 06:31 AM
My wife isn't crazy about this image... FHPhotographer Post Your Photos! 16 09-11-2008 03:29 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top