Originally posted by 123jippo
hhmmm is Sigma 17-50 f2.8 really clearly better lens than Tamron 17-50 and DA* 16-50 f2.8? I remember there is comparision in this site and all 3 lenses did get about equal value.
They might be of equal value, but thats only when weighed up against the pro's and con's. According to the comparison review, the Sigma isn't so good with flare, but is sharp wide open. The Tamron on the other hand is the opposite - good flare resistance but not so sharp wide open. It all comes down to what you want to use it for. My purposes is events and indoor stuff, I won't be taking particularly artsy photos involving bright light sources! And since it's sharp wide open, perfect for indoor low light. I'm not even considering the DA* though cause it's poor value for money and just way too expensive :P