Originally posted by gooseta Since when did this become buyolympus.com? Is no-one going to vouch for the amount of resolution you miss with the omd compared to the similarly priced K5ii/s?
Don't you realize it?
This site has degraded into 'Camera Enthusiast' rather than 'Pentax Forums'.
Lots of those who have jumped ship for various reasons (which is valid and fine) still linger on here touting their new wares (which is not fine).
Maybe they can't fit into 'CanNikOly Forums'?? Or the moderation here is lax/don't care??
To TS,
I've had the GF1 and have a G3 (14; 20, 45).
They are nice cameras.
Smallish camera, small lenses (light, but mostly plastic), still needed some sort of camera bag though to take out a 3 lens kit.
For me, at the end of the day, a camera like a K30 and even K5 is smallish enough for me (still fits into the same small camera bag for a 3 lens kit);
Weight difference is not that big a deal. Think of carrying 1 small water bottle (~330ml = 330gm); that sort of difference is not big deal for me in real life, especially when I cross sling my bag or camera.
The K5/K30 files can be pushed in PP much better than the G3 file (OMD is just a bit better in this respect).
But download samples on the internet and play around with the file (eg. levels, saturation, curves, shadow/highlights, filters, sharpen) and judge for yourself if the file quality is good enough for you.
I'd choose the K5/K30, but that's my type of photography (generallist - landscapes; peoplel; travel; streets; macro).
Most of the native m4/3 lenses are sharp from wide open, but then they are also mostly center sharp instead of sharp across if that is of any concern.