Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-29-2012, 07:05 AM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 691
Strange Encounter with the K5IIs

Suddenly the DA* 16-50 seems to have less CA @ f2.8. Perhaps they compliment each other? I never had that much details with K5 and any lens with my fish models. And the zippy auto focus... Happy camper I am

The let down was the AF-C, it is still a hit and miss affair.




11-29-2012, 07:43 AM   #2
Pentaxian
halfspin's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 254
Painfully sharp. Nice shot!
11-29-2012, 07:49 AM   #3
Veteran Member
VisualDarkness's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,441
Is that with flash? If so what combo? Truly amazingly sharp and clean and I've seen many, many and many aquarium shots.
11-29-2012, 08:07 AM   #4
New Member




Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
I mentioned this in another post about PF..

upon receipt of a new K-01 a couple of weeks ago I was testing the camera with my 77 Limited, which can really put out major amounts of PF on my k10D. On the K-01 with original firmware the shots were showing PF even worse than I had ever seen it before. I was afraid that it was something in the K-01 that was faulty it was so bad.

Well.. I went ahead and downloaded the new 1.01 (?) firmware and using the same lens could virtually not make PF if I wated to.

I feel like Pentax has installed expert treatment of lens correction in firmware that is in at least the K-01 new firmware and the K5 IIs that makes a night and day difference, maybe for all APS-C firmware done after a recent date. I havent really noticed this with the K-30 but havent really been watching it

I have been trying to discern whether the regular K5 II has such an update as well thought there is not yet a significant user base/sample base for the camera as yet. I have also been trying to discern what the overall effect of such correction has on the "rendering" mostly in regard to overall color in use of these cameras. I absolutely love the K5 Classic color reproduction and wonder if it has significantly changed with this new level of firmware correction. I do know that my K-01 is very pleasing in this regard and the answers to these questions will be a big factor in my purchase of a replacement for my K10D

nice phishphoto BTW

11-29-2012, 08:27 AM   #5
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 21
Wow, that is really nice. So, the af isn't that great at low light?

Steve
11-29-2012, 10:03 AM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: GMT +10
Photos: Albums
Posts: 10,800
QuoteOriginally posted by desmoface Quote
So, the af isn't that great at low light?
How do you read that in what he said?

Without putting words in his mouth, AF-C was not great for him. Otherwise he said AF was zippy and he was a happy camper.

Also that shot is a great result for 1/80 sec, plus shot through aquarium glass.
11-29-2012, 02:02 PM   #7
Site Supporter
slip's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 2 hours north of toronto ontario canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,532
Darn, you just made my choice between the k5iis and the K5II a lot harder
Great shot

Thanks

Randy
11-29-2012, 03:51 PM   #8
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 691
Original Poster
Thanks for the comments guys. I had kick myself if the k5 ii and k5 resolution are identical. I am pleased with k5iis.

I didn't use any Flash at all. Iso @400. Imagine the sharpness if it was iso 80.

I don't think it is about firmware. I shoot raw.

I am not sure if the sr is improved as well? The Sr was on.

I never thought f2.8 with the 16-50 could be that usable

11-30-2012, 01:55 AM   #9
Senior Member




Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 248
Very nice cichlid too!
11-30-2012, 12:27 PM   #10
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 65
damn… making me heart-sick over my old crew of African cichlids. :-( I had those guys for almost 10 years by the time the last one turned it in.
11-30-2012, 05:17 PM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 691
Original Poster
Thanks guys. This is a South American cichlid. A rare wild caught azul that cost around a limited 31 :P
11-30-2012, 10:30 PM   #12
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 65
He looks really cool… How big is he? The biggest of mine grew only to 3.5 inches or so, but this guy looks like he might be bigger (or is it just your lens?)
02-13-2013, 03:37 AM   #13
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 58
QuoteOriginally posted by slip Quote
Darn, you just made my choice between the k5iis and the K5II a lot harder
Great shot

Thanks

Randy
I would have thought it would make your choice easier.....I get my k5iis in a few days. Can't wait.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, pentax k-5
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with what lens to obtain for K5IIs CaLay Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 13 12-17-2012 06:50 PM
Anyone encounter problem with K5's rear command wheel? aaronius Pentax K-5 14 06-12-2011 06:01 PM
Any known issues with the K5 or did you encounter an issue? Rin Pentax K-5 30 11-29-2010 12:23 AM
My first encounter with snow & the law JohnM Pentax DSLR Discussion 58 01-06-2008 06:21 PM
Encounter with Mo Rocca SCGushue Post Your Photos! 6 05-22-2007 04:11 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top