Creampuff, what an emotional post.
This thread is what makes me doubt about the differnce in resolution.
www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5/207505-pentax-k-5-iis-vs-k-5-ii-take-two.html
Like i said if you can point me out details that the normal version is missing that would be very helpful since i hardly see a differnce sadly. According to your post there should actually be a huge differnce, so how come i find these differnces so hard to see? I'm curious about your explanation.
Non of the reviews are helpful with this matter either, since they are comparing images straight out of the camera with the same adjustments by the RAW processor. That's were the fault lies, camera's with AA filter needs to be handled different from camera's without one.
DXO mark goes for example even further and they make for every camera and lens combination en special profile to ensure the best details.
I'm very curious about the end results and not the begin results, is that such a strange thing?
Sadly i ain't in an position to spend that amount of money and i would go for a normal version since i'm mostly doing portraits and i'm already having troubles with moire as it is.
Problem i'm having is that some are claiming that the resolution is a lot higher, i simple want some proof of that.
Is that so wrong to ask? It seems so according to you.