Originally posted by stormtech Interesting......have you shot both cameras side by side to come to this conclusion?
No, but I've read a handful of reviews from people who have used both side by side. They concluded that the Pentax has a better professional type image that leaves more data intact for post processing, but straight out of the camera, the Nikon had truer color and contrast.
Most likely, I will be staying with Pentax because of familiarity and the deal that was offered by Adorama gives me the primes I want for significantly less than I could get the Nikon primes.
That has probably been my biggest issue with Pentax: the high price of lenses on the used market compared to Nikon.
(except for the really old manual lenses, but even many of those are crazy high price compared to NikCanon varieties)
BTW, Normhead, regarding the extended warranty:
Have you seen what Adorama is charging for a Pentax 2-year extended warranty? (3y total, straight from Pentax)
It is only $20. Hardly a gamble at that price and if I saved that money, I doubt I'd be taking a vacation on it. Maybe I could buy lunch while on vacation
Like I said, the ext warranty is a no brainer on that deal. Now, for the 3rd party warranties that are $100-$200 (higher prices come with more expensive bodies), that is a gamble that may not pay off. Honestly, I've never had a problem requiring service on any of my SLR/DSLR cameras.