Originally posted by Reptilezz Thanks adam. If i got the pentax i could get a tamron 70-200 f2.8 di ld but if i get the nikon i would have to get a cheaper lens like a sigma 70-300 cheapo one, would this turn the tables a bit if i had a better lens? Also im not worried about the bigger lens lineup because sigma is always gonna be here.
Thanks
actually what do you shoot? the 70-200 2.8 and 70-300 are 2 totally different lens, even though their range over lap some what, they're not even in the same categories.
If you're looking where else, the canon 6D ain't bad, i saw it running with the 24-105 L for 2000, which is close to what you're willing to spend on a K-5 II + 70-200 2.8 Tamron.
And that particular combo is very useful the 24-105 is a nice lens that can do a lot of different type of photography.