Originally posted by jannking I also bought a K-r a month ago. I Just saw somebody is selling the non-OEM k-r battery holder for $10 at the marketplace and am thinking whether I should go for this AA holder or this Lithium battery for backup. Looks like you have issues with the AAs. Would you like to share your opinions?
For most people I'd say it would be a no-brainer. Buying and carrying around an adapter
plus 4 batteries; or, the smaller more efficient Li type block, which happens to be available for far less money total. I believe fitting the adapter cage into the camera isn't a simple drop-in job either, so swap overs might take more than 5 seconds. However YMMV.
OK I don't have anything against AA per se, it serves or served its purpose, but life moves on and my present car doesn't even have a carburettor!
Still have a fair investment in AAs too, about 7 sets of 4x NiMH rechargables in use, or on hand/spare at present -- I also own 2 off-camera flashes, a Pentax K-x, and one Canon UZ camera, plus the typical toys, gadgets, appliances etc., usual shit that most people accumulate for everyday household use that all take AA.
So when I caved in and bought a K-r, for convenience alone it could (should?) have been compelling to acquire the adapter for that as well, but experience with the K-x proved that wouldn't be clever at all. And fortnately Pentax marketing seers were smart enough to include it in the pack, thereby raising the cost of the camera by $n amount, only to create litter by being
neither wanted or ever used by n% of K-r buyers, n being a presumably large number estimated by their expertise and research figures. In fact why not throw in a Li-Ion spare instead? At least that dedicated battery backaup is sure to work in the camera, whereas many AA brands people might buy or already own probably won't (deja vu K-x).
Did I mention a friend who bought his K-x to me a few weeks backs asking why it wouldn't boot up on his brand new set of expensive Duracell rechargeables that he'd bought on the run, and fully charged? OK then, I won't mention that. And yes, the new batteries worked perfectly, as they were, no problem, in
everything else we tried them in.
He was just another naive Pentax owner who'd got AA bitten.
Unlike my Canon, world+dog... Pentax just hasn't got a bloody clue re: making product that accepts ANY brand or type of AA,
and that can use them with modern day power-efficency standards in mind -- yeah some claim Pentax "fixed" that K-x issue with firmware update 1.01. Yeah riiiiight! bullshit they did, 1.01/1.02 only
improved the problem a bit. Like the doctor putting a band-aid on cancer.
Ahh but I digress...
Sure I could also go by the many forum posts that claim "I easily get 1,800+ shots with AAs in mine", and "Duracell are rubbish", but unfortunately having my own (+ friends) user figures on that as well as decades of "Online filtering" experience there that tends to conflict, just slightly [cough cough].
Also the fact that I just want to wean myself off "throwaway society attitudes" like nearing-redundant-lifespan AA tech as much as possible for eco reasons.
AA is also lower voltage, less power efficient per mass in available forms, more cumbersome, and the rechargeable NiMH fails to perform (at all, or as well) at lower weather temperatures too.
Overall lifespans of rechargeable Li-Ion tech always seems longer than any old barrel style like AA but I don't have numbers handy so that could even be fantasy in practice, though my other old Canon pocket P&S still chugs along after years on its small Li-Ion block, Notebooks/Netbooks on Li-Ion/Li-Pol, etc... I guess you have similar to experience too.
And AFAIK, the big mfgrs gave up fitting multiples of AA size to their DSLRs, and their higher-end P&S too, a long time ago. An Omen perhaps?
Thankfully Pentax had finally woken up with the K-r, and phased in the change. And I'd be willing to bet that its successor doesn't even offer an adapter or AA as an option.
So before jumping either way I urge you to do the numbers, on
all pertinent-to-you aspects, and see what works out viable for you to live with.
HTH and have fun with that K-r.
.R. -- who
tries [with far from 100% success rate] to be part of the solution; instead of remaining part of the problem - for convenience or apathy.