Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
09-27-2011, 06:40 PM   #1
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
budget macro photopgraphy

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


Hi Guys,

Im new to the forum and new to photography, just got my KR 2 weeks ago and loving it.

I just bought extension tubes, 2X teleconverter, 28mm-210mm Vivitar lens Macro 1.4 x.

I havent tried them out yet.

How do I tell if a lens is a true macro lens, what do the ratios mean? 1.4 x?

Just wanted to know if there are any budget macro photographers out there and what's your set up?

1. extension tubes
2. tele converters
3. raynox
4. or a combination of all or any of the above.
5. what type of lens

few free to post your macro shots and your set up details.

09-27-2011, 06:57 PM   #2
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,477
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-lens-articles/152336-cheap-macro-b...lose-work.html

I don't do a lot of macro photos, but when I do it is with a Sigma A 50mm f/2.8 macro.










I do have a set of M42 extension tubes and one day I'll get around to putting my Super Tak 50/1.4 on them.

Last edited by boriscleto; 09-27-2011 at 07:03 PM.
09-27-2011, 07:31 PM   #3
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Original Poster
great shots, love the ant, and thanks for the link, its very informative.
09-27-2011, 07:50 PM   #4
Veteran Member
hangman43's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hueytown, Alabama
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,508
This one was a 35-80mm reversed on a homemade tube set up

This one is a 50/2 reversed on same tube with homemade flash deflector in a room with very little light


09-27-2011, 07:52 PM   #5
Veteran Member
joe.penn's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland (Right Outside Washington DC)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,902
First off, welcome to the forums

As boriscleto mentioned, check out the link he posted, really good stuff.

About the lens - the "1:4" magnification is essentially magnification up to a quarter (25%) life size whereas "1:1" is life size, your 1:4 is more on the lines of "Kind-of-Close-Focusing" and not really macro (I see macro as 1:2 or better).

I am not too familiar with that Vivitar lens, is it a newer one? Some of the zoom type macro lenses have kind of what could be seen as zones; meaning, macro magnification is only within a certain focal range of the lens, like -> 70-210 macro, macro only 120-210 range (if that makes sense to you ). There are a ton of great dedicated macro lenses out there, and a "ga-zillion" other lenses that can be tubed that make great macro lenses. For me, here is my current macro lens lineup:

Vivitar 105mm 2.5 Macro
Vivitar 28-105mm 2.8 Macro (IMHO, one of the best zoom MF macro's to be had)
Panagor 90mm 2.8 Macro
Vivitar 55mm 2.8 Macro
Vivitar Automatic Tubes (use with many different K-mount lenses)

IMO, something as important as your lenses is your lighting - without proper lighting is won't matter what lenses you are using. Here are some macro shots I have taken recently with a couple of the listed lenses:

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/160419-macro-wide-angle-...g-spiders.html
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/160273-macro-spiders-more-spiders.html
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/160060-macro-few-hoverflys-today.html


Good luck and hope to see some of your macro work posted here on the forums ...

---
09-27-2011, 07:56 PM   #6
Veteran Member
hangman43's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hueytown, Alabama
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,508
My problem is shaky hands and eyes that are not what they used to be.
09-27-2011, 08:21 PM   #7
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,263
Hi there. I wrote the CHEAP MACRO article. Glad you like it!

As you might see from the article, I'm not a big fan of teleconverters. There are various ways to approach macro work, depending on your needs and budget. If you have a big budget, buy a great dedicated AF macro lens. If you have less money, my article covers lots of stuff.

Here's what I do myself:

* I really really like using cheap enlarger lenses on bellows and tubes; great flexibility.
* I keep a Raynox DCR-250 and some cheap closeup sets in my bag always, just in case.
* I have many sets of macro tubes and use them often when I don't need to change focus.
* I have some manual-everything macro lenses. I love them & use them some, but not much.
* I have various mount-reversal rings for when I want to work very very close to a subject.
* I have a couple variable-magnification macro teleconverters but hardly ever use them.
* I usually don't reverse-stack lenses because I rarely work at such extreme magnification.

That's just me. Your mileage may vary. If you really want to learn about macro, get the classic Field Photography: Beginning and Advanced Techniques : Alfred A. Blaker which is still a major steal at Amazon. Have fun!

09-27-2011, 08:49 PM   #8
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Original Poster
joe.penn, love the spider shots, especially the one taken with 28mm-105mm vivitar.

eBay Australia: Buy new & used fashion, electronics & home d?r

this is the lens I purchased.

I'll try out some shots tonight with that lens and extension tubes and post them up.

RioRico, after reading your article, I purchased a reverse adaptor, I have a few old Mamiya ZE lens lying around which are 52 mmm so I'll put them to good use.

I've got most things now, I think now its just a matter of playing around with the setup to see what's best.
09-28-2011, 05:22 AM   #9
Senior Member




Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 102
i use my da 55-300 with raynox 150 and i must say im very happy with the results, but its really really hard to focus, especially without a tripod.





09-28-2011, 07:39 AM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
sergysergy's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,175
Whatever your option is I would recommend a flash with a diffuser
10-07-2011, 01:50 PM   #11
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
I definitely recommend the Raynox 150 (or 250 for shorter lenses). I picked one up on ebay for less that $50.00 and it does wonders with my DA 55-300!
10-07-2011, 02:34 PM   #12
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 3,206
QuoteOriginally posted by hangman43 Quote
My problem is shaky hands and eyes that are not what they used to be.
Tripod, macro focusing rail, and ring flash are your friends.

10-07-2011, 03:03 PM   #13
Veteran Member
Chex's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The 'Stoke, British Columbia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,678
I really would love a ringflash.. maybe after the UWA lens.. for now I just reverse my 43mm in front of a SuperTak 55mm f2.0 or use my Tamron SP 60-300 Macro or Takumar-A 28-80mm Macro.. real macro modes, not lame "close focusing"
10-07-2011, 03:37 PM   #14
Veteran Member
yeatzee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Temecula
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,675
Cheap macro's what I do

The basics are already covered above so i wont bother re-posting them. What do you want to shoot? Flowers? Tiny insects?


Also primes are the way to go for macro.

Doesn't matter if its a $20 Pentax M 50mm F/1.7 reversed...




$20 el nikkor 50mm F/2.8N enlarging lens reversed....




$10 componon 80mm F/5.6 enlarging lens reversed.....




etc. etc.

the key there is reversing the lenses on some sort of extension, whether it be bellows or extension tubes. You can also go about the stacking way, which works very well with certain lens setups (see: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tanneryates/5692657326/in/set-72157626650549520). The other key is a flash setup, homemade diffuser's, brackets, etc.

Last edited by yeatzee; 10-07-2011 at 03:43 PM.
10-10-2011, 08:58 PM   #15
New Member




Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: LaPocatiere (Qc) Canada
Posts: 4
yeatzee, these shot are crazy... and you do this only with reversed lens
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
budget, budget macro, camera, extension, k-r, kr, lens, macro, pentax k-r, tubes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which macro on a smaller budget screwedon Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 11-06-2010 07:19 AM
Macro shooting/lens on a BUDGET KxBlaze Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 12 04-09-2010 06:17 PM
Best budget macro lens? raver1414 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 12-10-2009 12:50 PM
Budget Macro stuff... Pentaxperson Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 05-27-2009 01:07 AM
Macro options (on a budget) Zou Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 07-29-2008 12:06 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top