Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-02-2012, 10:24 AM   #16
Veteran Member
Philoslothical's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,723
Aye, they're really good lenses for what they are. They can't compete with dedicated macro lenses, but they're also less than 1/4 the price. The results someone posted towards the end of the thread using a 100mm macro lens with a raynox are incredible. I wondered about that, nice to see some results.

02-02-2012, 10:49 AM   #17
Inactive Account

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
In a few words it is difficult to properly quantify the image quality expected from a Raynox 150 on the DA 55-300

One way to say it is that for natural subjects & electronic displays the results may be indistinguishable from that of a perfect lens; except for the edges - but look at example macros - it is very unusual for edges to matter.

This description probably also holds for the Marumi +5 which costs about $20 less than the Raynox 150.

Last edited by newarts; 02-02-2012 at 10:54 AM.
02-02-2012, 04:02 PM - 1 Like   #18
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,264
Some info:

Keep in mind that different macro techniques involve certain working distances. With powerful +dioptre adapters like the Raynox DCR-250, or reversed camera lenses, or short focal length lenses on extension, you must work VERY CLOSE to achieve significant magnification. If shooting living critters or flowers etc outdoors handheld at magnification 1:1 or less, a macro lens in the 90-200mm range is often preferred. If shooting wee tiny dead stuff indoors with the camera tripodded, reversed or stacked lenses or short focal length lenses on extension may be preferred.

Another consideration: Is edge-to-edge flatfield sharpness required? If such sharpness is needed, then a macro lens, or an enlarger lens on extension, are the preferable tools. If not, a Raynox or even a simple cheap +dioptre adapter may be sufficient. Such adapters have several benefits: They don't eat light. They don't interfere with camera automation. They don't require special gear. They're small, inexpensive, convenient. They're a good place to start.
02-02-2012, 07:28 PM   #19
Veteran Member

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago suburbs
Photos: Albums
Posts: 848
I didn't see anyone mention a teleconverter with the glass removed. It makes a dandy extension tube. Depending on what teleconverter you start with, you can get full meter function and even auto focus. Not sure how important auto focus is with macro though.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, da-l, k-r, kit, kr, lenses, macro, pentax k-r, photography, raynox
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Raynox DCR-150 Macro Adapter lens. GaryH Sold Items 2 11-12-2011 10:48 AM
Raynox macro converter on 50mm lens? ratm4484 Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 5 04-05-2011 04:50 PM
Raynox macro- a few questions before I buy dinneenp Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 7 02-03-2011 01:39 PM
Raynox lens for macro shooting Gary G Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 11-19-2010 08:43 AM
Raynox 150 not giving me better macro :( SirJangly Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 09-24-2010 10:56 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]