Macro my beautiful macro pictures!

my beautiful macro pictures! · 01:39 PM

Adam · 05-22-2010, 10:14 PM

Second shot is great! These looks like they've been compressed a lot; you don't need to go below jpeg 9 to stay within forum limits, though.

JohnBee · 05-22-2010, 10:21 PM

Nice work...

I like no.2 the most

The others seem to be a bit... oof or blurry.
As Adam stated, detail loss due to compression, but I'm not sure if that's all were seeing here though(to close perhaps? motion blur?)

huskies4ever · 05-24-2010, 07:48 PM

Originally posted by JohnBee

Nice work...

I like no.2 the most

The others seem to be a bit... oof or blurry.
As Adam stated, detail loss due to compression, but I'm not sure if that's all were seeing here though(to close perhaps? motion blur?)

not blurry just not with a big camera like a dslr and i'm new to the macro stuff anyway but thanks for the reply's

zelovoc · 05-25-2010, 12:46 PM

i think they are really bad photos. mainly in terms of image quality. if you are capable of 1cm macro you should make muuuuch better photos. at first, don`t use high iso on bridge camera. set your camera to macro mode and try to make your best. i made this, cca 3 years ago with canon ixus 70: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/2343058655_8aa9ac65ae_o.jpg

photolady95 · 05-25-2010, 04:08 PM

Maybe not blurry but definitely OOF. This one of mine was taken with a Nikon Coolpix L11, simple p&s.

So you just need to pay attention to what you're doing, and be steady handed, or use a tripod.

huskies4ever · 05-27-2010, 11:49 PM

Originally posted by zelovoc

i think they are really bad photos. mainly in terms of image quality. if you are capable of 1cm macro you should make muuuuch better photos. at first, don`t use high iso on bridge camera. set your camera to macro mode and try to make your best. i made this, cca 3 years ago with canon ixus 70: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/2343058655_8aa9ac65ae_o.jpg

you know that took alot of guts to say that! because I am a animal photographer and these are some of my first maro pictures and sorry my bad about the iso forgot about it being so high

and you think my pictures are bad? haha your's looks like a 3 year old took that picture hahahahahahahaha

Last edited by huskies4ever; 05-28-2010 at 01:55 PM.

huskies4ever
	View full profile
	Find other posts by huskies4ever
	Find threads started by huskies4ever
	Find threads in which huskies4ever has posted

05-22-2010, 10:14 PM	#2
Adam Administrator Site Webmaster Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Arizona Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 51,608	Second shot is great! These looks like they've been compressed a lot; you don't need to go below jpeg 9 to stay within forum limits, though. Adam PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide \| Site Help \| My Photography) PentaxForums.com server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating or purchasing one of our Pentax eBooks. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

05-27-2010, 11:49 PM	#7
huskies4ever Forum Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 61 Original Poster	Originally posted by zelovoc i think they are really bad photos. mainly in terms of image quality. if you are capable of 1cm macro you should make muuuuch better photos. at first, don`t use high iso on bridge camera. set your camera to macro mode and try to make your best. i made this, cca 3 years ago with canon ixus 70: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/2343058655_8aa9ac65ae_o.jpg you know that took alot of guts to say that! because I am a animal photographer and these are some of my first maro pictures and sorry my bad about the iso forgot about it being so highand you think my pictures are bad? haha your's looks like a 3 year old took that picture hahahahahahahaha Last edited by huskies4ever; 05-28-2010 at 01:55 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Would I get better macro pictures with a macro lens?	albatross	Photographic Technique	23	01-22-2010 03:22 PM
My first to weeks with a K20D, my first Dslr, 35/2,8 macro LTD (alot of pictures)	melander	Post Your Photos!	17	08-13-2008 12:01 PM
my beautiful beach!	distorted_vision	Post Your Photos!	25	01-10-2008 03:29 AM
The Beautiful Portuguese Language And A Beautiful Voice: Jane Monheit	Mike Bokeh	General Talk	1	12-03-2007 05:43 PM
Once was beautiful	chrisman	Monthly Photo Contests	0	11-23-2007 03:30 AM

05-22-2010, 10:21 PM	#3
JohnBee Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Newrfoundland Photos: Albums Posts: 4,667	Nice work... I like no.2 the most The others seem to be a bit... oof or blurry. As Adam stated, detail loss due to compression, but I'm not sure if that's all were seeing here though(to close perhaps? motion blur?)

05-24-2010, 07:48 PM	#4
huskies4ever Forum Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 61 Original Poster	Originally posted by JohnBee Nice work... I like no.2 the most The others seem to be a bit... oof or blurry. As Adam stated, detail loss due to compression, but I'm not sure if that's all were seeing here though(to close perhaps? motion blur?) not blurry just not with a big camera like a dslr and i'm new to the macro stuff anyway but thanks for the reply's

05-25-2010, 12:46 PM	#5
zelovoc Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Kosice Posts: 80	i think they are really bad photos. mainly in terms of image quality. if you are capable of 1cm macro you should make muuuuch better photos. at first, don`t use high iso on bridge camera. set your camera to macro mode and try to make your best. i made this, cca 3 years ago with canon ixus 70: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/2343058655_8aa9ac65ae_o.jpg

05-25-2010, 04:08 PM	#6
photolady95 Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: May 2009 Location: Cruising the forum watching his back Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 12,712	Maybe not blurry but definitely OOF. This one of mine was taken with a Nikon Coolpix L11, simple p&s. So you just need to pay attention to what you're doing, and be steady handed, or use a tripod.