Originally posted by Bramela
Have a look at Mr Hyde's shot what a difference the longer lens makes.
Of course, the longer lens does make a difference. But not as much as you'd think.
I took this using a K10D and a 400mm lens:
It's not as good as Mr Hyde's, but it's acceptable, and this is about 2/3 the size of the original 100% crop. At the 300mm you used, the image size will be smaller than possible with a 400mm lens, but reasonable sharpness is still perfectly possible.
From the 0.7s exposure you gave the first shot, even without any other issues, movement blur would be significant at the enlargement you've chosen.
The other thing is the aperture you chose was F32. At such tiny apertures, lenses are less sharp than they are wider open, since diffraction blurring is starting to become significant.
So, bottom line, for moon shots:
- short exposures (1/100 s or less)
- wider apertures (F16 or more - depth of field is not a worry here!)
- better to underexpose a bit rather than overexpose, so as not to burn out the detail.
- use a tripod, and the timer with the 2s delay so that the mirror is already up when the shutter opens, to prevent vibration
- for focusing, use the green hexagon in the viewfinder for focus confirmation. The red dot does not tell you it's in focus, only which AF segments it's using.
Try again - I bet you'll be surprised how much better you can achieve.