Thanks for your comments, guys.
Originally posted by Arpe You won't notice graininess in all that action, especially in the water.
I took more on Monday at 200, 400, and 800 to experiment, and you're right, the graininess is evident only in some photos when doing a 1:1 crop on the kayakers. Haven't processed them all yet, and am anxious to see how they compare to these.
Originally posted by VaughnA Great shots, as a former whitewater kayaker they make me smile. Which river was it on? And I agree with Arpe, don't worry too much about ISO in that situation. Up the ISO so you can freeze the action a bit better.
Glad you liked 'em, VaughnA. I've done a lot of whitewater paddling in canoes and 'yaks, but never any creeking like these guys. I'll leave the waterfalls to them. Unfortunately, Monday's shoot was done under darker conditions, with complete overcast, so freezing action was harder even with the higher ISO.
Originally posted by opiet70 I love the shots!
The posters who pointed out higher ISO are right. Figure 1 stop gained for each ISO step (100 to 200 = 1 stop, 100 to 400 = 2 stops). I almost always jump up to at least ISO 200 and sometimes 400 depending on the light conditions. Unfortunately, my K10D starts getting pretty grainy after that.
The one thing that I was looking for that I didn't see was a picture of a the face of a kayaker just surfacing after a dunking that is razor sharp. To me, that would exemplify the sport and make for a fantastic action shot! Just my 2c...
I've noticed significant graininess in some parts of some pictures when my K200D is set to 400 or 800, too. Capturing the faces as they come out of the water was one of my aims, but they move SO fast that I only got a few. Will post some as I process them, if I find any which are worth showing off.