Originally posted by 8540tomg Thanks Dave,
This lens (M 400/5.6) is a challenge and I miss a lot of shots but that's no big deal when shooting in the digital format.
On the other hand I wouldn't get any shots like these at all with the rest of my lens collection.
The new K5 looks like a very good camera and a significant upgrade to my K10. I wonder how much better the results could be with a K5? I think this will be my next purchase unless the family gives me one for Christmas - unlikely.
Tom G
Tom, as usual, nothing short of excellent.
If you are considering the K5, you may wish to look at the thread on Manual Aperture Lenses and metering. From results posted by Bende8 and comparing them to results I have for other bodies, it looks like the K5 meters as well as the origonal *istD with Manual Aperture lenses, with about only +/- 1/2 stop exposure drift over the whole range of apertures.
That is a lot better than your K10D. (or mine)
One thing is for sure, you don't need any lenses, you seem to make your's work just fine