Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
  #1
First attempt at a bird in flight
Lens: DA*60-250 Camera: K-5 Photo Location: backyard ISO: 1600 Shutter Speed: 1/1000s Aperture: F5.6 
Posted By: dgaies, 12-27-2010, 02:46 PM

Ok, so I had a few minutes before I had to pick up the kids so I thought I'd take the 60-250 outside and try catch a bird in flight. Turns out it's a lot easier said than done; it also turns out that 250mm doesn't get you very far, even for very large birds like these

(significantly cropped from the original image)

Views: 2,219
12-27-2010, 07:36 PM   #2
Veteran Member
stillshunter's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Southern Tablelands NSW
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 406
Not bad for a crop...and for a BIF newbie

So how much did you have to crop Dan? Just wondering how much to laud the K5 and/or DA* lens and/or the photog
12-27-2010, 07:49 PM   #3
Veteran Member
dgaies's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland / Washington DC
Posts: 3,917
Original Poster
Thanks

The original size of the crop was 1500x2250 (~4MP, ~25% of the original pixels).

Here's the full frame (reduced the size for the web) just to give you an idea of how much was cropped.


Last edited by dgaies; 12-28-2010 at 06:41 AM.
12-27-2010, 08:05 PM   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
dadipentak's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,590
Well done, Dan! Yes, 250mm is short for such purposes--but longer lengths bring their own challenges.

12-27-2010, 08:51 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Bob Harris's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canon City, Colorado
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 18,477
Nice shot, is that some type of a vulture? Bob
12-27-2010, 08:59 PM   #6
Veteran Member
Otis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis FanOtis Fan
Rupert's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 25,123
Bob, down here in Texas we call those "Oklahoma Eagles".......not sure it is much appreciated north of the Red River........
Best Regards!
12-27-2010, 09:05 PM   #7
Veteran Member
dgaies's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland / Washington DC
Posts: 3,917
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by dadipentak Quote
Well done, Dan! Yes, 250mm is short for such purposes--but longer lengths bring their own challenges.
Thanks. Yeah, the 60-250 is actually the longest lenses I own at the moment. knew it would be a little short, but I figured I'd give it a try as I had about 20 minutes to kill before I had to pick up the kids

QuoteOriginally posted by Bob Harris Quote
Nice shot, is that some type of a vulture? Bob
Yeah, I think it's a Turkey Vulture (according to my wife). There was about 100-150 of them sitting in the four trees next to my house where I was shooting them. At any given time there were about 30-40 flying around. We live right next to a road that has a lot of deer/car accidents so they just sit in the tree all day and wait for a deer to get hit. Wish their numbers, it doesn't take them long to pretty much make the deer disappear.

12-27-2010, 10:17 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Bob Harris's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canon City, Colorado
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 18,477
I thought that is what they were, when we were in Arizona, they would migrate through the area and when they would settle in a Cottonwood tree for the night, you could not see them sitting in the trees. I always thought they migrated for the winter, but with a food supply like that, why leave. If I remember correctly, the vulture is the only bird capable of smelling, no other bird can do that.
Rupert, the Texas/Oklahoma battle continues, whether it is football or anything else. In Arizona we called these "Mexican Eagles", I wonder why...a bit of a battle there also. Thanks for the information, looking forward to more shots from your area. Bob
12-28-2010, 12:30 AM   #9
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,521
The only eagle that flies the North American skies is the American bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). The "Mexican eagle" isn't actually an eagle at all. It's real name is the crested caracara (Caracara cheriway), and it's all falcon, despite its eagle-like appearance and anything but falcon-like behavior.

Read more: Mexican Eagle Vs. American Eagle | eHow.com Mexican Eagle Vs. American Eagle | eHow.com

Your wife is likely right (Women usually are. LOL) looks more like a Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura).
12-28-2010, 12:47 AM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Bob Harris's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canon City, Colorado
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 18,477
Sparkle, you missed my point about the Mexican Eagle, it was a joke about it, the vulture, being the national bird of Mexico. Bob
12-28-2010, 01:56 AM   #11
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,521
Sorry, but you missed my point, Mexico's National Bird is not a Vulture:


Mexico Site
Les Shulman
BellaOnline's Mexico Editor



What is Mexico's National Bird?

What is the national bird of Mexico? The question initially appears to be quite straightforward but the answer turns out to be not so clear. While many sources definitively maintain that the golden eagle is Mexico’s national bird, others state with just as much certainty that it is the crested caracara, and at least one other claims that both of those raptors deserve that designation. Pretty confusing, isn’t it?

It seems that the confusion has to do with the image that is on Mexico’s emblem/coat-of-arms and its flag, created in 1821, which symbolizes the nation’s Aztec heritage; the one that depicts a bird perched on a nopal/prickly pear cactus devouring a serpent while grasping it with one of its claws. Most sources (though not all!) contend that on the current flag, which has in its history been revised four times, the last revision occurring in 1968, the bird depicted is a golden eagle. However, many believe that the flag in its original form represented none other than the crested caracara. Given the nature and characteristics of the crested caracara, oftentimes referred to as the Mexican eagle or as the Northern caracara, such confusion is not that surprising because that anomalous bird is one confusing sentient being.

Was I ever confused the first time that I saw that bird! While birding in San Blas, Nayarit, in a nearby field, I saw about fifteen black vultures and turkey vultures feeding on some carrion. About 30 feet from those scavenger birds, I had a very “good look” at another bird doing the same; yet, although I was a novice birder, I definitely could tell that this bird was not a vulture or buzzard. Although I was certain that it was not any scavenger that I was familiar with, I had absolutely no idea what type of bird it was. So, I made a notation in my bird notepad to research what species was that “confidant and regal-looking bird with an eccentric flattop hairstyle.” After already mind-bogglingly seeing over 200 species of birds in that famous “birders paradise” in only four days, confusion was becoming pretty normal for me, anyways.

Eventually, I determined that it was a crested caracara, a bird that is truly confusingly unique. You see, although the caracara, based on it internal structural characteristics, is classified as being a member of the falcon family, its external appearance is more like that of an eagle while its behaviors are very often similar to those of vultures. Physically, it is a medium-sized falcon, about 22 inches long with a 4 foot wingspan, weighing 1.8-2.8 pounds, and is mostly black with a highly distinctive flat black crest, an unfeathered red face, bluish eagle-like hooked beak, grey throat and neck, white base of tail,and long legs that are bare from the knees down. Certainly, not falcon-like in appearance at all!

As for its behaviors, this caracara bears little resemblance to those of any other falcons. While falcons are known to be airborne often, soaring high and then suddenly and swiftly diving to attack their live prey, the caracara is primarily terrestrial, hardly ever flies high or for long periods of time, and quite often, as it is extremely agile afoot, runs down its prey in fields or shallow wetlands. Known to eat pretty much anything manageable it comes upon, living or dead, its diet is quite dissimilar than that of the typical non-scavanging falcon. With a range from the southern parts of Texas, Arizona, and Florida (rarely in southwestern Louisiana), throughout most of Mexico, through Central America and South America down to Tierra Del Fuego, little wonder then that this largely ground dwelling falcon has been called “a tropical falcon version of a vulture.” Moreover, they are the only member of the falcon family that builds nests rather than laying its eggs in holes in the ground or in rock crevices.

Getting back to the now not so simple, confusing question of what is the national bird of Mexico, both the crested caracara and the golden eagle, one of the largest raptors in North America, had an important place in the mythology, folklore, symbolism, and imagery of the Mayans and Aztecs. Highly esteemed by these indigenous peoples of Mesoamerica, their plumage was used for capes and headdresses for royalty and their claws for royal jewelry. Both species, either rightfully or wrongfully, have been construed as being the bird that was originally on the nation’s emblem/coat-of-arms and flag.

Consequently, perhaps both birds deserve to have equal billing as Mexico’s national bird. After all, aren’t the exceedingly idiosyncratic crested caracaras commonly referred to as the “Mexican eagle” and never as the “Mexican vulture!” A vulture as a national symbol, probably not, but a doing-its-own-thing falcon look-alike eagle, why not?
12-28-2010, 06:15 AM   #12
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Sailor's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Coastal Texas
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 26,205
Hey, Dan - your first attempt is better than anything I've been able to do with BIF. Nice job.

Jer
12-28-2010, 06:54 AM   #13
Veteran Member
dgaies's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maryland / Washington DC
Posts: 3,917
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Sailor Quote
Hey, Dan - your first attempt is better than anything I've been able to do with BIF. Nice job.
Thanks

There were a couple other decent shots from that session, but there were plenty of misses. I guess I didn't realize how narrow the FOV is looking through the viewfinder at 250mm. Makes me realize how much harder it would be to try and capture BIF at 400-506mm
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
bird, camera, flight, photo
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nature Bird in flight with 15mm lens pingflood Post Your Photos! 6 01-02-2010 06:45 PM
Bird in flight 7.62lew Post Your Photos! 13 01-06-2009 02:06 PM
Bird In Flight at f/1.2 !! jsherman999 Post Your Photos! 15 01-04-2009 01:27 PM
Bird in flight with the DA*300 rfortson Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 10-24-2008 01:38 AM
Attempt to capture a Bald Eagle in flight falconeye Post Your Photos! 2 06-12-2008 05:52 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top