Rarely do we get morning like this in my area where frost remains on the trees through mid morning. I took five vertical shots and stitched them in Photo Shop Elements. Other then a small amount of sharping, no other PP was done. JIM

PS: Have over a 100 to process form this morning still!!

[Jimbo]

PS... These were all shot at 50mm giving me a certain frame. There is no way to capture the same image with a different lens. JIM

[Frogfish]

That's a great question and in a way you are right. I have a couple of lenses that are wide enouth to cover this range. I read a few months ago about making one image look like a MF image by combining 4-6 imagrs vertically. This image was 16 mg's combined which means I can print just about any size. For me its about trying new ways to produce a image. I will print this one and see if my approach was correct. JIM

Interesting. Thank you for the explanation and something else for me to research.

[Sailor]

Beautiful shot, buddy - and I appreciate the discussion and now understand the value of doing this sort of thing rather than simply using a wider lens.

Jer

[slowpez]

Beautiful shot Jim. Thanks for the explanation of the "why".

[Jimbo]

Beautiful shot, buddy - and I appreciate the discussion and now understand the value of doing this sort of thing rather than simply using a wider lens.

Jer

Jer, shooting the five image vertically gives a whole different look then taking the shot with one lens. First, I am not sure I could pull off the same image with just one lens. I would have to five up something. [Focal length or how much I could get into the foreground and sky] This is like using a MF camera say a 4x6 and what the person would see and shoot from his or her equipment. Give it a try and see if you can pull it off with just a lens change. Not sure it would be work or at least look the same. All the five images were shot at 50mm. JIM

Beautiful shot Jim. Thanks for the explanation of the "why".

Thank you. I read something new and I just want to run out and try it. JIM

[kryss]

Jer, shooting the five image vertically gives a whole different look then taking the shot with one lens. First, I am not sure I could pull off the same image with just one lens. I would have to five up something. [Focal length or how much I could get into the foreground and sky] This is like using a MF camera say a 4x6 and what the person would see and shoot from his or her equipment. Give it a try and see if you can pull it off with just a lens change. Not sure it would be work or at least look the same. All the five images were shot at 50mm. JIM



Thank you. I read something new and I just want to run out and try it. JIM

Truly magnificent,especially for a new method.Will have to try my 50mm F 1.7 and maybe in a few months I may achieve this quality.Well done.

[Jimbo]

Truly magnificent,especially for a new method.Will have to try my 50mm F 1.7 and maybe in a few months I may achieve this quality.Well done.

Thank you Dave. For this process I used my 16-50 at 50. I may try ther 50 1.7 too. JIM

[kryss]

Thank you Dave. For this process I used my 16-50 at 50. I may try ther 50 1.7 too. JIM

All my lenses are primes(maybe 40 or so) except a Tamron 35-80mm which not only was cheap cheap but ridiculously sharp and great for walking around,And the names Kryss not Dave.

[Jimbo]

All my lenses are primes(maybe 40 or so) except a Tamron 35-80mm which not only was cheap cheap but ridiculously sharp and great for walking around,And the names Kryss not Dave.

Sorry about that. I just responded to another post and that guy was my buddy Dave so I put his name in. Sorry about that. JIM

[dubloons]

Very Nice!

[Jimbo]

Very Nice!

Thank you. JIM

[Colbyt]

Absolutely stunning.

[Jimbo]

Absolutely stunning.

Appreciate you looking and commenting. JIM

[cupic]

Your body of works keeps going threw the roof a pleasure TFS


cheers

[Jimbo]

Your body of works keeps going threw the roof a pleasure TFS

Much appreciate Cupic. Cheers JIM