Strictly for fun

Strictly for fun · 04:43 PM

So, I'm playing around with the FA*200 + the 1.7 AF teleconverter, inside the house here. I snapped this one - a sign hanging on my son's door. After DLing, and checking the EXIF, I was quite surprised to see that, with an effective focal length of about 340mm, I was able to hand-hold this shot at only 1/15!

Who says SR isn't worthwhile?

**distorted_vision** · 01-12-2008, 04:53 PM

yer, thats pretty good effort given the focal length that you mentioned.. SR is awesome as far as im concerned.. so many of my night time street lit shots, have been taken without a tripod etc, and they have come out fantastic

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
News Monthly Photo Contest Rules now strictly enforced	Adam	Site Suggestions and Help	3	09-28-2010 11:05 AM
People Serious Fun	overkillzone	Photo Critique	7	05-05-2010 12:18 PM
Pentax PPL strictly 8bit. what about others?	jeffkrol	Digital Processing, Software, and Printing	20	06-09-2009 07:57 AM
Ringlight final test... fun fun fun!	codiac2600	Post Your Photos!	16	02-04-2008 12:33 AM
OK, This might be fun....	dudlew	Post Your Photos!	5	04-21-2007 04:54 AM

01-12-2008, 04:53 PM	#2
distorted_vision Site Supporter Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Moving around Australia Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,308	yer, thats pretty good effort given the focal length that you mentioned.. SR is awesome as far as im concerned.. so many of my night time street lit shots, have been taken without a tripod etc, and they have come out fantastic