Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
  #1
PP Help needed
Lens: da 15 limited Camera: Pentax K5 Photo Location: Great North walk ISO: 80 Shutter Speed: Above 6s Aperture: F22 
Posted By: disco_owner, 06-15-2012, 09:20 PM

Hi Guys , when it comes to post processing I am completely lost . I don't have any software on my Komputer,
I have been using the Photobucket built-in photo-editing tool to tweak my photos. is there any PP that you can suggest that would enhance this image/s ?
or could I have taken this shot differently to capture the light .


Taken with Hoya NDx400 + Cokin P-series GND soft . I'm still learning . any input that you contribute is a learning curve for me.






Last edited by disco_owner; 06-16-2012 at 02:25 AM.
Views: 1,636
06-15-2012, 10:13 PM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,386
Hi

I guess what motivated you to take the picture in the first place, namely the beauty of all that plant growth together with some strong light that may have been present, is not coming across with this capture. It is just too dark, flat and featureless. I have attempted to rescue this shot within the limitations of the JPG format. While I realise that you wont be able to do similar corrections because, as you say, you don't have much of any software, I nevertheless present you with a feeble attempt (or general pointer) of what I have in mind. I have done all corrections in OLONEO. (French software)

Greetings

Last edited by Schraubstock; 09-16-2012 at 05:36 PM.
06-15-2012, 10:51 PM   #3
Veteran Member
disco_owner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,629
Original Poster
The 2nd shot post processed has so much more depth now. your version actually looks a lot more decent.if you don't mind me asking what adjustment/s were made to the image on your software ( OLONEO)


also from Memory I had the 2 x GND filter Medium & Low stacked on H250 holder but perhaps not raised enough which may be why the trees on both sides of the image appear to be underexposed.
06-16-2012, 02:27 AM   #4
Veteran Member
disco_owner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,629
Original Poster
Here is my version in PB editing tool



any improvements to the original ?

06-16-2012, 02:57 AM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Aylesbury, Bucks
Photos: Albums
Posts: 492
Post-processing software needn't be expensive. A lot of people get good results out of Google Picassa, which costs nothing more than a small part of your soul.

GIMP is free software that is every bit as capable as Photoshop. More of a learning wall than a learning curve, but that's equally true of PS. I don't know about DNG, but it can certainly handle PEF.

Even commercial software needn't be prohibitive. I recently laid out £99 (or ~$150) for Lightroom 4. That's not a lot compared to the price of good glass.
06-16-2012, 04:15 AM   #6
Pentaxian
charliezap's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: saugus ma
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,686
Top-Quark mentioned "Picasa".I have it as a back up and it is FREE.You can do quite a bit with it and I consider it very user friendly.Check it out.----charliezap
06-16-2012, 05:02 AM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Bob Harris's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canon City, Colorado
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 18,477
I'm going to go with what Charlie suggested. Give it a try, it is free and easy to use. You can even use it to upload camera photos directly to your computer. Click here and give it a try. Bob
Picasa

06-16-2012, 05:29 AM   #8
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
baro-nite's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,295
I know you're asking about PP, but the first thing that occurs to me is that this scene isn't a good case for GND. GNDs are best when there is a clean line between foreground and sky. or at least a gradually receding background where the GND effect looks reasonably natural. Branches against the sky is very difficult to deal with either with filters or in PP. My suggestion here is to try again in different light and/or with different focal length and/or framing to take the sky out of the shot.
06-16-2012, 05:33 AM   #9
Veteran Member
disco_owner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,629
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by top-quark Quote
Post-processing software needn't be expensive. A lot of people get good results out of Google Picassa, which costs nothing more than a small part of your soul.

GIMP is free software that is every bit as capable as Photoshop. More of a learning wall than a learning curve, but that's equally true of PS. I don't know about DNG, but it can certainly handle PEF.

Even commercial software needn't be prohibitive. I recently laid out £99 (or ~$150) for Lightroom 4. That's not a lot compared to the price of good glass.
The Problem is not the Dosh which I need to Fork out on Post processing Software , it's not really knowing how to enhance my images using the software package. that's my problem which is why I posted up the thread .

I haven't really had too much exposure to digital photography . Purchased my K5 at the end of April. only 2 months ago.

I Downloaded both Picasa 3 and Gimp . I'll give them a go. Photoshop LR4 is only $105.00 here "student edition" however I wouldn't know what to do with it.



Edit: thanks for your Comments and input.

@ Baro-nite I'm going to try the same shot under different lighting situation but with the same Lens da 15 ltd.and then compare it with the shot I took originally.

Last edited by disco_owner; 06-16-2012 at 05:43 AM.
06-16-2012, 06:06 AM   #10
Pentaxian
cmohr's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brisbane. Australia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,824
Try the "In camera" Black and White in the cameras white balance setting, I take a lot with it and its great as a quick conversion, plus you get to see black and white at the time you take it, you can still shoot RAW+ so you still have a raw image to use if you what colour, no need to PP, you just get a B&W straight out of the camera. Its a good start into digital Black and white, then you can look into software later.
06-16-2012, 07:06 AM   #11
Veteran Member
disco_owner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,629
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by cmohr Quote
Try the "In camera" Black and White in the cameras white balance setting, I take a lot with it and its great as a quick conversion, plus you get to see black and white at the time you take it, you can still shoot RAW+ so you still have a raw image to use if you what colour, no need to PP, you just get a B&W straight out of the camera. Its a good start into digital Black and white, then you can look into software later.
that's sort of exactly what I did with the 2 x shots. Both are taken as RAW+ & with in-camera B&W setting, tried to leave the white balance setting on AUTO.
then dump the files on my hard drive when I get home , but only upload the jpegs files.

Last edited by disco_owner; 06-17-2012 at 10:08 PM.
06-16-2012, 11:10 PM   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,386
Khosrow

...LR4 is only $105.00 here "student edition" however I wouldn't know what to do with it.

The thing is you have to make a start. I know it all sounds very much like an impossible task but you'll find once you get into it its not half as bad as you imagined. And the lingo ? You will pick up quickly, I am sure. Also, a lot of software vendors these days provide tutorial clips.

What did I do in OLONEO ? Answer, not much. OLONEO has Tone mapping sliders. Any functions in this software is real time. It means any corrections that are made are immediately observable in the image, so you don't have to wait for a re-draw. I really like that, because when you use sliders you can go back and forth with immediate results in the image and so settle quickly with the best setting to your eye.

Your image was only corrected by adjusting (on the plus side) "Tone Mapping strength and Tone Mapping detail" and a little increase in lightness.

As others said, start off with some free or cheap PP Software and try to find your feet, so to say. It will be either all you ever need or if not you can graduate from there into some more advanced applications. But by then at least you know how far you want to go and what you want from PP software. Beware ! It can become addictive, similar to "ALBS" ! (Acquired Lens Buying Syndrome)

Good luck
06-16-2012, 11:40 PM   #13
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,520
HI,

Not sure what system you are running (Mac or PC) but I use an app called Snapseed... Very easy to use and they just came out with a version for Windows & Mac. I use this app on my iPad and Mac... Its a great little app made by Nik Software... I want to say the app cost $20 for the mac.. so it should be the same for PC.

Snapseed | Snap it. Tweak it. Love it. Share it.

good Luck!
06-17-2012, 02:58 AM - 1 Like   #14
Veteran Member
disco_owner's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,629
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by EdwardConde Quote
HI,

Not sure what system you are running (Mac or PC) but I use an app called Snapseed... Very easy to use and they just came out with a version for Windows & Mac. I use this app on my iPad and Mac... Its a great little app made by Nik Software... I want to say the app cost $20 for the mac.. so it should be the same for PC.

Snapseed | Snap it. Tweak it. Love it. Share it.

good Luck!
I'm running an i7 Laptop with Windoze 7. Successfully downloaded Gimp and Picasso and have already processed a few photos using Picaso . It is very basic which suits me . I saw what Aperture can do on a Macbook Pro. I was quite impressed. Will Give Snapseed a go. I logged onto the site and had a read. here is a shot from Today 25km Hike to the Gorge with Minimum PP.

06-17-2012, 03:47 AM   #15
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
baro-nite's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Carolina, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,295
QuoteOriginally posted by disco_owner Quote
here is a shot from Today 25km Hike to the Gorge with Minimum PP.
Very nice composition! Did you use an ND filter here?
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, photo, pp

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
zoom lens input needed Jool Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 10-01-2011 12:18 PM
What you needed to know . . . pacerr Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 2 01-31-2011 03:50 PM
Help Needed Jon_Mon Site Suggestions and Help 2 10-30-2010 11:37 AM
pentax k-m a little help needed deeps_10 Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 09-01-2010 03:55 AM
Nature Bird ID needed again photolady95 Post Your Photos! 8 08-01-2010 12:47 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top