Originally posted by vonBaloney Even if they could, and they were right, so what? A picture with an "enhanced sunset" is a bad picture? The comment was totally uncalled for and completely idiotic.
Well I agree with you there. It is the fact that the comment was out of line that twisted my panties.
Originally posted by charliezap This shot Susan has minimal brightness and contrast alterations.Who's to say what a picture should look like? The universe is in "default setting" It's up to us to show what it can look like through different perceptions of realities.
-charliezap
Another beauty Charlie.
Originally posted by riff I agree with vonBaloney!
Thanks riff.
Originally posted by JinDesu Solution - get the OGPS1 and geotag your photo
Wouldn't help - the comment from the judge was about his opinion that Alabama doesn't have sunsets like that so I must have altered it. Proving I had taken it there would not have convinced him it wasn't altered.
Originally posted by Bruce Clark You are right to feel upset over those ill informed comments. I think anyone who has submitted photos to PEG has experienced the sour taste these sarcastic, ill informed and irrelevant comments leave in the mouth. For the record, my score is 0 out of 8 acceptances with PEG and 5 out of 5 with PPG. Personally I do not think I will bother to submit any more photos to PEG., which is sad as it is OUR gallery after all.
If you look at the number of photos accepted in a thirty day period, it is pretty darn low. Either we are not submitting any or we are all terrible photographers. Too many great photos here for me to believe that there are so few photos that qualify and heck I've had 7 accepted but doubt I will ever get another in. I will keep trying though if for no other reason than to give the judges something to do. At least there were comments this time and some of them were actually spot on. I just wish there was more constructive in constructive criticism.