Originally posted by Bruce Clark Wow great shots. Suddenly I feel the need to save a few pennies.
I was feeling the same things for months before I finally got it.
Originally posted by Den Enjoy the lens. I've had one for a few months now and for large expanse views it is great. Interior real estate shots too. The 1st and last shot seem to be the same image, was that the intention?
No, it's the new photo bucket, I find it so hard to keep track of what I'm doing. I'll have to go back and fix that. I odn't know why people just can't leave stuff that works alone.
Originally posted by ivanvernon Interesting images. I have the Pentax 10-17 mm, and wouldn't give it up now that I am beginning to realize its potential.What I have found particularly interesting is that you can shoot, even at widest, and still get fairly normal looking images. What I means is that they are still fisheye, but not obviously so to the viewer. One trick is to keep vertical lines right in the middle of the viewer, and no vertical lines near the outside of the viewer. When this is true, especially for landscapes, you can get views that are quite distorted in reality, but not in appearance, because they look the way the landscape COULD have looked.
We also have the 10-17, and, there are places where I love it, but we also have pictures we took last summer, taken with the fisheye, where the fisheye distortion made the images unusable... so I've been lusting after this lens ever since it came out. There are a number of place I have on my list to go to to reshoot using this lens. It has better control of CA and purple fringing, and much less distortion...
When you get a shot with the 10-17 it can be something amazing... when it doesn't work out and you misss a shot because you didn't have something like the 8-16, all you can do is stare at your computer and wish you had a rectilinear lens.