Originally posted by Prizmatic Idea good, but photos have failed...
The configuration of space of a photo " does not allow idea to be embodied "...
There's a language issue here, Prizmatic's other posts are also, um, a wee bit crytpic. Takes a little interpretation. Where the heck is RF, by the way? It's bad enough we've got all the Americans assuming everyone knows what NM or AZ stands for... not to mention Canadians thinking the world knows where NB is!
Originally posted by clarenceclose In looking at the photos I think I understand what Prizmatic is saying...
The photos are static and the object of your attention is very centered in the photo. With a little better compostion, getting off center, the photos would be more dynamic and give a better rendition of what you saw to others.
This sounds as good an interpretation as any. With the object centered, you go to it and stop. Put it off center, and your eye wanders about the scene, and you enjoy it a little longer. It's not just about the object, it's about where the object is. At least that's
my interpretation!
Julie