Posted a few digital ones from this shoot earlier (https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/12-post-your-photos/299758-people-lily-summer-seattle.html) but you know me, I always prefer the film (all of these are Kodak Ultramax 400). Love the '70s vibe in some of these - like they're plucked from a Serge Gainsbourg album cover.

There's a bunch of 'em but I can't help it because a) I like them a lot, and b) it's possible I've had one too many whiskeys.

1. Olympus 35RC, Zuiko 42mm 2.8 (the square bokeh is crazy!)

2.

3.

4. K1000, K 135mm 2.5

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. K1000, Voigtlander Nokton 58mm 1.4 SL II

10.

11.

12. K1000, K 135mm 2.5

13.

14.

15.

[Canis]

Another great series! You are correct a real 70's vibe! Beautiful model.

[alan_smithee_photos]

Another great series! You are correct a real 70's vibe! Beautiful model.

Thx much!!

[waterfall]

Posted a few digital ones from this shoot earlier (https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/12-post-your-photos/299758-people-lily-summer-seattle.html) but you know me, I always prefer the film (all of these are Kodak Ultramax 400). Love the '70s vibe in some of these - like they're plucked from a Serge Gainsbourg album cover.

There's a bunch of 'em but I can't help it because a) I like them a lot, and b) it's possible I've had one too many whiskeys.

1. Olympus 35RC, Zuiko 42mm 2.8 (the square bokeh is crazy!)

2.

3.

4. K1000, K 135mm 2.5

5.

6.

7.

8.

9. K1000, Voigtlander Nokton 58mm 1.4 SL II

10.

11.

12. K1000, K 135mm 2.5

13.

14.

15.

Ethereal photos of a woods nymph. I like them.

[LFLee]

great lights!

I got to ask, I always get green tint for shots in the woods like these, but yours seem fine, which lab did you use? or you correct them in post?

[alan_smithee_photos]

great lights!

I got to ask, I always get green tint for shots in the woods like these, but yours seem fine, which lab did you use? or you correct them in post?

Thx!

It's funny, I have the same green tint problem with my digital photos a lot of times but it doesn't seem to be an issue with film. Somebody smarter than me on here could probably explain it. But like lots of things, my film processing is way faster than my digital processing. It's more often the way I like it as is than with digital. (Some credit goes to Panda Lab here in Seattle. They're awesome.)