Originally posted by chibae
I am using a K5. I am just starting down the road of attempting to take bird photos. At the moment I am exploring equipment options but that is for a future purchase. I have no extra funds right now for purchasing gear. So, I am using the gear I have and working with it. When I am out birding I don't carry a tripod, or monopod, unless my spotting scope is on it.
I have started a new thread under pet photos to show what type of photography I normally do.
My comment wasn't meant to discourage either. It has taken me a long time to be able to invest in a K-3II and DA*300, and even then there are better kits. Before that, like you, I made do with what I had which was an old tokina 400 5.6 AT-X AF, and before that an ancient canon 100-300 5.6L and 50D. There is nothing wrong with sharpening your skills with what you can afford.
The reason for my comment is that from my experience of upgrading my kit over the last few years, it looks like the lens quality is the limiting factor in the shot rather than the camera. I had the K-5 and I know it can produce sharper images even cropped that far.