Originally posted by wildman Kerrowdown,
A question: On your shots and others I have seen, it looks like much of Scotland is denuded of trees from the viewpoint of someone who has grown up in the forests of eastern N. America. Is this more or less natural or the result of human activity such as centuries of grazing or, to put it another way, what would have natural Scotland looked like a 1000 years ago? Just wondering,
Gleann nan mile cogaran means The Glen of a thousand whispers, when you stand still, silent and patient, the glen is alive with fascinating sounds.
In order to best answer your question, I took a run up the Glen Affric today, which probably has the last few remaining pockets of true Caledonian forrest i.e. as 1000 years ago.
I was also hoping for it be, as it's other known name... Glenn nan dō-aireamhan which means the glen of countless colours, but I may have still been a tad early.
You can see the mixed forrest grows up to the snow line, where due to erosion there it's just bare rock.