Originally posted by SJM Love it.
Thank you!
Originally posted by PenPusher Very nice shot, can't help wondering though if Oscar would approve as one of his reasons for inventing the Leica was to ditch the tripod.
Originally posted by SSGGeezer Beautiful image.
---------- Post added 11-18-17 at 01:16 PM ----------
---------- Post added 11-18-17 at 01:16 PM ----------
Is that true?? Interesting history lesson if so.
Originally posted by PenPusher As far as I know it is.
He originally had a plate camera, 4" x 5" I think, wooden box of glass plates, wooden tripod, a bad chest and Wetzlar is hilly, so he wanted to lighten the load. He originally tried masking a glass plate so he could take several photos on the same plate and ditch the box of plates, it didn't work satisfactorily so plan B was to use the most plentiful available alternative to glass plates which turned out to be 35mm cine film.
Vieri probably knows the full story.
Well, as far as I know the story is pretty much true - he wasn't against the tripod philosophically or in principle, the thing is that cameras were very large and heavy back at the beginning of the 1900s, he suffered from asthma and wanted to lighten the load he had to carry, he started experimenting and ended up with what we know know as the 135 format (or 35mm). I think he would be ok with carbon fiber tripods, and I don't think he would shoot landscapes handheld anyway
That said, I have maximum respect for Oscar Barnack's work, as should everyone who is using anything smaller than a 4x5 inches camera today, but when it comes to my own work I just use what I feel is best in the way I feel works better to realise my vision... and I need to use a tripod, sorry Oscar!
Best regards,
Vieri