Originally posted by dr00p Wauw! Really nice!
Thanks Maurits! (Dankjewel!)
Originally posted by Mr. Ed Really interesting. What a difference. Cool.
Ed, thanks! The positioning in the two shots is slightly different. As the tide was going out I was able to venture out in the sea a little bit more. But yes, the difference is really big. The nice thing about long exposures is that you have only limited control of what the photo eventually will look like. Although with choosing when to stop exposing (in bulb) you can preserve some characteristics of the scene in front of you the dynamics of the sea and sky alway's inject a healthy dose of unpredictability in the end result.
Originally posted by mikeSF love that long exposure. it shows the sky motion beautifully
Thanks Mike! As someone who admires your work I do appreciate you stopping by and commenting.
Originally posted by photomax7 Your experimenting paid off Fries...very nice images.
Thanks! Normally I am inclined to shoot landscapes in my own backyard almost exclusively with a ND filter but recently I've started challenging my self again by trying to shoot interesting land- and seascapes without ND-filters.
Originally posted by Patriot Like one with long exposure, excellent work.
Michael, thanks! I am so lucky living near such a World Heritage site to work with...
Originally posted by BigMackCam Very different shots, yet equally beautiful. Nice work, Remco!
Thanks Mike! Glad you like them.
Originally posted by AlexBW Very nice photo. The long exposure is beautiful!
Alex, thanks! It was a bit of a hassle to correctly position the tripod correctly with the tide flowing over the rocks to get this composition but I am quite happy with the end result in the second photo.