Originally posted by marlon Hehe, if you could capture the bike blurfree, but still have the wheel blur (perhaps some panning), damn, what a shot that would make!
I did try a few panned shots, landscape orientation with slower shutter speeds. I was able to get the bike frozen, background blurred, but lighting was an issue. There was just a band / section of light where the bike would be properly illuminated. I seemed to either be catching one side or the other. As the number of laps / chances dwindled away (only had 8 laps to work with) I went with the best odds (and least moving parts - the most unreliable part being me - ha ha)
One thing I do believe is that commercial images / media condition us and shape our expectation as to what a subject generally looks like. Not saying that we would not recognize or appreciate a particular subject if it appeared differently (and sometimes those are the ones that hit the ball out of the park, refreshing, exciting, new) but rather the tried and true served up tends to meet with easy approval and instant recognition. I really need to see what motocross pictures should look like. I will have to raid my nephew's stash of magazines and thumb through them. I could make a quick check list of points to try.
I like your idea about showing some motion blur with the back, and maybe the front tires as it may give a sense of energy and motion to the shot.
Thank for the thoughts Marlon