Originally posted by roentarre You are certainly so creative with careful composition and playing with depth of field style quite a bit. Close focus with a long throw of background is usually desired by most of us with floral or dew pic (well, whatelse can we do not to throw the background out of focus anyway)
The only image that really proves my dislike of this lens is the purple fringing along the silouette of your leaves in the 6th shot. The fact that you bump up the contrast and saturation making the CA even more prominent, hence my main dislike of this lens. Though you use this focal length very well in deed
Diggin on the DOF play with the close focus/marco converter on the lens. Just rocking, more like breathing, back and forth to focus... Same at any f/stop. Got one I'll post where I was breathing in and out to get the back leaves of the flower, strongly back lit, in focus. Fun. So Zen.
In defense of the 50 for that shot:
I shot that into the sun using the onboard flash. That is pretty harsh. So I am curious about your critique of the lens. Just out to learn.
Here is the original straight out of camera and one with minimal PP. I don't know how to correct for this in PP yet.
And last one is of the flower I mentioned.
Thanks for the insight.