Girl Shooting - Double Action!

[NWS] Girl Shooting - Double Action! · 08:33 AM

Comments/inputs and critiques are welcome!

Lighting info:

(1) 285 camera left thru umbrella (1/4th)
(1) 285 camera right thru umbrella (1/16th)
(1) 285 subject right/left snooted for kicker light (1/16th)

(1) background llight with color gel (not every picture)

cupic · 12-06-2008, 01:00 AM

I have no criticism Hell I vote for more free style work

cheers

procyon · 12-06-2008, 02:45 AM

2 and 5 look real good, 1 could also have been great, but the lighting is a bit off, and it seems like DOF was also too shallow.
Oh and personally I really don't get the NSFW thing .... as long as viewing web pages at work is OK, these images should not raise any additional concerns. Most banners feature far more suggestive poses and less clothing.

Gooshin · 12-06-2008, 04:57 AM

Originally posted by procyon

2 and 5 look real good, 1 could also have been great, but the lighting is a bit off, and it seems like DOF was also too shallow.
Oh and personally I really don't get the NSFW thing .... as long as viewing web pages at work is OK, these images should not raise any additional concerns. Most banners feature far more suggestive poses and less clothing.

banners dont take up your entire screen

listen guys, this is pg13 for sure but try explaining that to your boss who happens to quickly glance at your screen

BBear
	View full profile
	Contact via private message
	Find other posts by BBear
	Find threads started by BBear
	Find threads in which BBear has posted

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Nature Seeing Double	Jimbo	Post Your Photos!	3	07-27-2010 09:26 AM
Low light action shooting	JeffAdams	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	19	04-08-2010 04:34 PM
Double Vision	King_Boru	Monthly Photo Contests	0	01-02-2010 05:48 PM
k7 wants double exposure	zxaar	Pentax DSLR Discussion	15	12-14-2009 08:41 AM
Shooting the photographer shooting my sons engagement photos	skinja	Post Your Photos!	13	07-04-2008 12:14 PM

12-06-2008, 01:00 AM	#16
cupic Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Australia-NSW Photos: Gallery Posts: 4,824	I have no criticism Hell I vote for more free style work cheers

12-06-2008, 02:45 AM	#17
procyon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Tallinn Posts: 265	2 and 5 look real good, 1 could also have been great, but the lighting is a bit off, and it seems like DOF was also too shallow. Oh and personally I really don't get the NSFW thing .... as long as viewing web pages at work is OK, these images should not raise any additional concerns. Most banners feature far more suggestive poses and less clothing.

12-06-2008, 04:57 AM	#18
Gooshin Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Toronto, the one in Canada. Posts: 5,610	Originally posted by procyon 2 and 5 look real good, 1 could also have been great, but the lighting is a bit off, and it seems like DOF was also too shallow. Oh and personally I really don't get the NSFW thing .... as long as viewing web pages at work is OK, these images should not raise any additional concerns. Most banners feature far more suggestive poses and less clothing. banners dont take up your entire screen listen guys, this is pg13 for sure but try explaining that to your boss who happens to quickly glance at your screen