Originally posted by Sailor The first one is - in my view - a knock out. The intensity is there and very clear(dancing wouldn't have occured to me, but frankly - I don't care). I would brighten the image just a bit (not much).
Wish I could do this well.
Jer
Wow! Thank you. Will bring this through Ps too. Was processing these and others while taking breaks from my remodeling. Will work the image a tad brighter.
Originally posted by mwcfire I prefer the coloring, softness, and highlights in the second shot.
I so like this one for that. Thanks for sharing.
Originally posted by Venturi FWIW, I did actually get "dancer" at first glance.
There's something about the "blown" highlights of #2 that I like. But overall I much prefer #1.
There is a sense of movement in #1 that is missing in #2 and I think the crop is what does it; #2 is too centered. The more subdued light in #1 also gives it a more dramatic, or theatrical, feel. And finally, the tighter crop of #1 pulls the viewer in to her face where you see the intensity you're wishing to depict.
Funny about how people react to dance photos. They sometimes need symbolic-stylized components and blur; sometimes they don't. That's OK.
I do both!
It is about the dynamics of drama, theater, passion.
{
}
I'll get opportunity to shot these two under studio lighting!
Thinking two soft boxes high and deep. hard light high and front some barndoored gel lights low across the floor from the sides and tight up and down. Like Columns of light they cross into. Maybe even make some tight snoots too. Want to use the gel to sculpt rather than harsh shadows.
Trying to think of the lighting more in the round. So it will be different as I round the area. They dance for about 5-15 minutes a round. maybe two or three rounds with enough rest to set up the lights differently. One round I want to pull way back and use a longer lens too.
Oh yeah... I'll try reversing the treatment to crop in these two and see what happens!
Thank to all for the comments and encouragement.