These examples (pairs actually) are from visit to an old power plant museum, where in low light I used my normal flash (Metz 58). Lucky I also had my tripod with me because the available light in many cases was way more interesting than what I could get with flash. Flash may reveal more in documentary sense but artistically I preferred the available light most of the time.

What do you think (a is available light and b is flash version):

In these my point is clear, I think:

#1 a


#1 b


In these one can argue for either one, which do you prefer

#2 a


#2 b


This is my favourite, but only with available light...

#3 a only

[Jimbo]

I like them Georg. The external flash ic new to me too. Still playing around and making a lot of crap images. Well done. JIM

[netuser]

Nice series.
Like the A images without flash but both are very well done.

[gawan]

I like them Georg. The external flash ic new to me too. Still playing around and making a lot of crap images. Well done. JIM

Nice series.
Like the A images without flash but both are very well done.

Jim and Netuser, thanks guys!

[Sailor]

Georg - I vote for the "A" shots - but it's close. Very interesting images either way.

Jer

[gawan]

Georg - I vote for the "A" shots - but it's close. Very interesting images either way.

Jer

Thanks Jer!