Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

High Class @ Low Cost · 04:57 PM

Pentax K20D
Auto-Takumar 55/2

Taken last night during rehearsal for today's recital (which I have to dash off to shoot in a few minutes).

Light was from a National PE-3057 and a Pentax AF200T, a pair of low-tech wonders from the 1980s, each of which set me back ten whole dollars.

The Auto-Takumar 55/2 is a 50 year old kit lens, which I got as a freebie on a refurbished S2 body I bought for about $25.

**Ash** · 11-02-2009, 05:09 PM

Well done Mike.
Did you radio trigger these flashes? The result is quite good, a little harsh on her face, but very accpetable.
I like.

Mike Cash · 11-02-2009, 05:29 PM

Originally posted by Ash

Well done Mike.
Did you radio trigger these flashes? The result is quite good, a little harsh on her face, but very accpetable.
I like.

Triggering was with Flash Waves.

The flashes are on manual power settings and have to cover the entire stage, with the performances ranging all across the stage and hence making fine-tuning light output impossible.....at least within the technological limitations of the flashes I'm using, anyway.

**Ash** · 11-02-2009, 05:41 PM

So you just had to work around the limitations by positioning the flashes at varying distances from the subject, I take it.
Good job with that mate.

Barnster · 11-02-2009, 06:29 PM

Nice use of your lighting Mike!

Mike Cash · 11-03-2009, 02:26 AM

Originally posted by Ash

So you just had to work around the limitations by positioning the flashes at varying distances from the subject, I take it.
Good job with that mate.

The lights were set up alongside the seating area, each about 25 feet from center stage and angled in kinda-sorta aimed at center stage. My goal was to get somewhere around f4 or f5.6 of light at ISO800 and I was able to do that and shot the whole show today at 1/125 @ f5.6.

What I ended up doing today was on solo dances going with Takumar lenses and just the house lights. Keeping manually focused on one dancer isn't too burdensome. When I knew there would be two or more, I quickly swapped back to the Tamron 17-50/2.8 so I could take advantage of the zoom and autofocus. On some of those I used flash, and not on others. I made far far less use of flash than I did last year.

**Heinrich Lohmann** · 11-03-2009, 09:16 PM

Very nice Mike, looking forward to seeing some images of the performance.

**xs400** · 11-03-2009, 09:42 PM

Excellent work on a low budget. Well done. Thanks for reminding us that we don't expensive equipment to get a great image.

Mike Cash
	View full profile
	Contact via private message
	Find other posts by Mike Cash
	Find threads started by Mike Cash
	Find threads in which Mike Cash has posted

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Another 85mm f2 - ultra low cost	yusuf	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	41	03-29-2011 01:45 PM
Which is BEST Low-Cost Pentax DSLR UNDER $300 Used?	PentaxForums-User	Pentax DSLR Discussion	51	04-10-2010 07:54 PM
Low cost / high quality DSLR ?	Luin Gor	Pentax DSLR Discussion	19	01-15-2010 11:57 PM
low cost macro photography	marcusyoung	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	9	12-08-2009 01:34 PM
Low cost macro	Haakan	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	4	08-23-2008 06:21 PM

11-02-2009, 05:09 PM	#2
Ash Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toowoomba, Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 23,920	Well done Mike. Did you radio trigger these flashes? The result is quite good, a little harsh on her face, but very accpetable. I like.

11-02-2009, 05:29 PM	#3
Mike Cash Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Japan Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,950 Original Poster	Originally posted by Ash Well done Mike. Did you radio trigger these flashes? The result is quite good, a little harsh on her face, but very accpetable. I like. Triggering was with Flash Waves. The flashes are on manual power settings and have to cover the entire stage, with the performances ranging all across the stage and hence making fine-tuning light output impossible.....at least within the technological limitations of the flashes I'm using, anyway.

11-02-2009, 05:41 PM	#4
Ash Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toowoomba, Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 23,920	So you just had to work around the limitations by positioning the flashes at varying distances from the subject, I take it. Good job with that mate.

11-02-2009, 06:29 PM	#5
Barnster Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Mid North Coast,Australia Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,016	Nice use of your lighting Mike!

11-03-2009, 02:26 AM	#6
Mike Cash Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Japan Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,950 Original Poster	Originally posted by Ash So you just had to work around the limitations by positioning the flashes at varying distances from the subject, I take it. Good job with that mate. The lights were set up alongside the seating area, each about 25 feet from center stage and angled in kinda-sorta aimed at center stage. My goal was to get somewhere around f4 or f5.6 of light at ISO800 and I was able to do that and shot the whole show today at 1/125 @ f5.6. What I ended up doing today was on solo dances going with Takumar lenses and just the house lights. Keeping manually focused on one dancer isn't too burdensome. When I knew there would be two or more, I quickly swapped back to the Tamron 17-50/2.8 so I could take advantage of the zoom and autofocus. On some of those I used flash, and not on others. I made far far less use of flash than I did last year.

11-03-2009, 09:16 PM	#7
Heinrich Lohmann Site Supporter Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Airdrie, Alberta Canada Photos: Gallery Posts: 8,097	Very nice Mike, looking forward to seeing some images of the performance.

11-03-2009, 09:42 PM	#8
xs400 Site Supporter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,939	Excellent work on a low budget. Well done. Thanks for reminding us that we don't expensive equipment to get a great image.

People High Class @ Low Cost

Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!