Originally posted by carpents That really stinks about the no photography. It was the same when Body Worlds was there. Fortunately it was only the 'special exhibits' that have such a shortcoming.
(Similarly, I told the gentleman at the Museum of Modern Art in Rome how "unenlightened" he was to disallow photography. It isn't just here.)
I'm sorry to say that friends of mine attended the misnamed Tut exhibit last month. I didn't want to spoil it for you in advance, so I never mentioned it.
What a coincidence that I was up north on Saturday, and it was an absolute stunner - not more than 70 degrees, almost all sun, no humidity...my idea of a perfect late Spring day. When I got home Saturday evening it was hot and muggy...my idea of why I want to get the h*ll off the East Coast.
I'll be back up in not too long - hopefully not when you're in Philly again!!
(I do love this shot, btw - and my super-old Super-Takumar 35/3.5 is a pretty darn good lens, so I'm sure the SMC version is even better.)
Take care,
Sean
Sean,
I'm really sorry that fate had us in each others backyard on this weekend. I must tell you though I had a great time in Philly. Glad you enjoyed the weather up in the mountains up north. Though I have to tell you that Friday, in Philly, was astronomically hotter than Saturday. But the sun shone and Judy and I had a great time.
On Tut: I can't say it was a waste of a C note to see the exhibit. Quite frankly, there were one or two things to see that made it worth going (as in, funerary box, a golden cermonial fan with great fret work, and a golden dagger, that alone, was worth the price of admission... if you enjoy art
). But, thank you for not letting me know ahead of time...more for my wife's sake than mine.
As for no photography, I guess they want to bleed you dry in the gift shop
. And if you took photos...what would be the reason to overspend the the TUT SHOP.
But, in the end it was wonderful.
On the SMCK... I think your right. I used Takumars when M42 was the universal standard. Luckily, when I started doing photography for a living the bayonets came into existance. But the 35/3.5 is beyond belief in resolution. This is perhaps the most highly regarded lens in Pentax history with respect to resolution numbers. I found little to no CA and flare was fairly well handeled... though some does show on the skylight in the rotuna. Then again, the extremes in daylight and the near darkness of the rotunda would stress any digital imaging situation...regardless of make and model. As I wrote you seperately, I found the SMCP A 35-105 3.5 handled itself just as well. Manual metering is much more enjoyable and specific than programing. Well, for static situations anyway.
I'll post on Philly shortly. Hope to hear back from you and get some additional indsight from you.
Also, I think I'd like to have you show me around town on a shooting.
It is even more interesting than NYC in my opinion.
Stephen