Quote: Jim, I like the first one best. As far as the second one I am with Song. About the third one: I think it is quite hard to make a good pic of waterfalls from above....
Said that, you did a great job, again. Sharpness is great, I love the smoothness of the water and the rich colours! With about 4" exposure (ND filters?) you must have had no wind at all, did you?
No wind though it was a little dark on here thus the long exposure and I was running F 9.5-18 looking for a certain DOF. As someone mentioned, maybe a quicker shutter speed would have improved the water look. Something to work on the next time. JIM
Quote: Would've liked it more if you did a 1s shutter. Water is It's too creamy.
I agree Alex though, at the time, I was looking at DOF. I will give that a try the next time. JIM
Quote: think #3 is POTENTIALLY the best shot.
The stream moving diagonally across the FOV was the right idea but you should have included a bit more of the length of the stream I think.
Including more of the surrounding habitat is important to this kind of shot.
It's not really so much a "landscape" shot as a environmental or habitat shot. The stream does not exist in isolation from the habitat around it so include more of it as you tried to do in #3.
The shutter speed is excessively slow - it makes the water look more like fog than water. The picture would be improved with more detail in the water. As it is it looks too much like a contrived cliche.
Thanks you for the comments. It does help for the next time I am hear. On #3 there was a road lower down leaving not as much of a angle as I wanted. I needed to try this shot further up the stream. JIM