Originally posted by BillM Kind of leaning towards Least Flycatcher, bright eye ring.
BINGO!
Bill got it right and for the right, and only reason, (applause).
At first I wasn't sure myself.
It was a Flycatcher (easy)
It was a Empidonax Flycatcher (pretty easy)
In my part of the world at this time of year it was one of three very closely related empidonax flycatchers:
1. Willow
2. Alder
3. Least
The Willow and Alder are so closely related genetically that you can't tell one from the other by field marks alone but only by hearing their songs. In fact they were once thought to be the same species - Traill's Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii).
Traills's Flycatcher was split into two species:
Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) and the Alder Flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum). They are so close genetically that they can be taught each others song I think.
Then there is the Least Flycatcher ((Empidonax minimus) not as close as the other two but still very close.
How to tell tell the difference? - Only the the Least Flycatcher has a bold distinct complete eye-ring, as Bill noted, the other two have notable less obvious and distinct eye-rings. A subtle difference but it's there. It's the difference in the eye-ring and pretty much nothing else between the three as far as field marks are concerned.
If it had been an Alder or Willow we probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference by a photo alone other than it was one or the other.
End of Ornithology lecture 101.
Thanks all, it's been fun.
Wildman