Originally posted by Imageman Expecting a modern "camera" to never lockup is I think simply hoping for something that cannot be.
I would expect the opposite, at least based on my experience with my previous two digital cameras (Canon G2 and Pentax K10D). I have been using the Canon since 2002 and have never had a lock-up. The K10D, I purchased in 2007 and it functioned without a hick-up until I sold it just a few weeks ago.
Now, perhaps neither of those is a modern camera, but my expectation would be that the increased capabilities of my K-3 should not be accompanied by decreased stability. I will restate for emphasis. Stability is the issue here. Electronic devices that simply die periodically do so because of design flaws coupled with deficiencies in QA testing procedures. Simply put, the engineers made a boo boo and the QA crew's test cases were not broad or deep enough to catch the issue before the product went to market. Alternatively (perish the thought), the product went to market with the maker being fully aware of the flaw. This happens, I know, I write software and have seen flawed product released to production because of schedule and/or cost to remedy.
Either way, it would be my expectation that my K-3 should be robust for general operation and common tasks. I know the context and I also know the reasonable expectations for stability. Come to think about it, perhaps that is why I never moved into management...
Steve