[nibutto]

100 macro f/2,8

---

Last edited by nibutto; 04-13-2012 at 11:27 AM.

[TenZ.NL]

Now that`s what I call "Vibrant colours"!
Nice series.

[Porga]

Tamron 90 macro
K-5

[jurysi]

Playing in the sand with the D-FA 100mm WR:

[Alibaba]

Just purchased my first macro lens - Lester A Dine 105mm 2.8 and had to test out. I am really pleased with the result and hopefully I will get better the more I use and understand. The only downside I will have to note aperture settings for my records.

Lester A Dine 105mm f8

[Freak]

One from me with the K-7 + 50-500mm (1:31) @200mm.

[tcbubbleleo]

One from me with the K-7 + 50-500mm (1:31) @200mm.

this is awesome!

[aliasant]

One from me with the K-7 + 50-500mm (1:31) @200mm.

Eh. Did you take that excellent image using the Sigma 50-500mm ?
I have the 150-500 Sigma and have been wanting to try it using extension tubes so if thats what you did I would love to hear your thoughts about it. If not...... Keep on shooting

[Quazimoto]

Hi guys,
I think this will be my first photo post here, I've only uploaded images of stuff I'm selling so I figure this is long overdue - but yeah I'm really loving macro so here I am, with my Tamron 90mm f2.8!
Now let's see if I get this right:



If some kind of bug-lover out there could identify either or both of these guys for me - please do!
Shot at the Central Coast in NSW, Australia. The first one was not a 'normal' fly, or a 'normal' bee. I don't think it was either a fly or a bee but I've no idea what it was.

[8540tomg]

Freak

Great job on that bee shot.

Tom G

[Freak]

this is awesome!

Thanks!

Eh. Did you take that excellent image using the Sigma 50-500mm ?

Yes.

I have the 150-500 Sigma and have been wanting to try it using extension tubes so if thats what you did I would love to hear your thoughts about it. If not...... Keep on shooting

I didn't use extension tubes (although that should work) this was just straight from Camera @ 200mm which on the 50-500 is 1:31 magnification, not sure if the 150-500 has the same magnification.

Freak

Great job on that bee shot.

Tom G

Cheers Tom.

The first one was not a 'normal' fly, or a 'normal' bee. I don't think it was either a fly or a bee but I've no idea what it was.

Welcome, the first shot is of a "Hoverfly" Hoverfly - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[JulianS]

D FA 100mm WR

[aliasant]

D FA 100mm WR

I bet he's wondering who was supposed to clean this place!

Great shot!

[aliasant]

I didn't use extension tubes (although that should work) this was just straight from Camera @ 200mm which on the 50-500 is 1:31 magnification, not sure if the 150-500 has the same magnification.

Wow.

I just tested my Sigma 150-500 @500mm / f6.7 closest range ( about 2.2meter) and heres a couple of shots just for comparison.
Im sure someone can do the math to get the mag rate but I dont think I can get close to yours on the 50-500mm.



Note the weird ghosting around some of the white leafs.

[TenZ.NL]

Now that`s impressive, shooting butterflies with a supertele...Nice shots and sharpness is quite good.
Not sure what that ghosting is?