Originally posted by and
Thanks for posting 180 shots! There are lots of shots from the 125, but I havent seen anyone else post shots from the 180. It seems very good, altho its a bit slow for my taste for a prime, but then again the size is small considering the focal length. The price is also right.
I wonder how it would do with portraits?
The numbers (180/4) certainly aren't anything eye catching, but as a result, it turns out to be a very compact little telephoto that can deliver shots as sharp as a fast normal for the price of one or less. Also having real APO and ED glass - you get the great resistance to CAs and vibrant color rendition. In the end, it really is a cool, compact, freehand medium telephoto that can give great shots for a low price. f4 is perfect for day time, outdoor stuff. I've pretty much ignored anything over 2.8 in this focal range as a matter of course until now, but with the potential the 125 had for producing 'keepers', I altered my priorities and took a chance on the 180/4. I haven't been disappointed.
I find it somewhat of an irony that the potential for increased shutterspeed denotes a lens as fast when in order to do so, it must increase in size and encumbrance - making it bulky and lethargic. To my mind, this 180/4 is 'fast' - I can carry it as an afterthought, slap it on and freehand around into all sorts of areas. Its much 'quicker' I suppose is the keyword, than a traditional tele. But again, this is all icing on the image quality.
With regards to portraits, I'm no expert but I would find the focal length a bit limiting for portraiture personally. Also, its f4 peak means it comes off the body when I go indoors anyways. This would certainly not be its strong suit for me. I did break out the 125 at a family gathering last night though, aside from it being a more generous 2.5 in low-light, the glass is virtually the same, hence you might find the following shots informative -